Pragmatic inference of scalar implicature by LLMs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This study investigates how Large Language Models (LLMs), particularly BERT (Devlin et al., 2019) and GPT-2 (Radford et al., 2019), engage in pragmatic inference of scalar implicature, such as some. Two sets of experiments were conducted using cosine similarity and next sentence/token prediction as experimental methods. The results in experiment 1 showed that, both models interpret some as pragmatic implicature not all in the absence of context, aligning with human language processing. In experiment 2, in which Question Under Discussion (QUD) was presented as a contextual cue, BERT showed consistent performance regardless of types of QUDs, while GPT-2 encountered processing difficulties since a certain type of QUD required pragmatic inference for implicature. The findings revealed that, in terms of theoretical approaches, BERT inherently incorporates pragmatic implicature not all within the term some, adhering to Default model (Levinson, 2000). In contrast, GPT-2 seems to encounter processing difficulties in inferring pragmatic implicature within context, consistent with Context-driven model (Sperber and Wilson, 2002).
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Aug 2024.
Builds on
7 of 42 references.
References · 7
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,346
- 2020Are Natural Language Inference Models IMPPRESsive? Learning IMPlicature and PRESuppositioncited by 76
- 2022Problems with Cosine as a Measure of Embedding Similarity for High Frequency Wordscited by 49
- 2019Harnessing the linguistic signal to predict scalar inferencescited by 17
- 2023Expectations over Unspoken Alternatives Predict Pragmatic Inferencescited by 9
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 2.
5 papers.
- 2025Are BabyLMs Deaf to Gricean Maxims? A Pragmatic Evaluation of Sample-efficient Language Modelscited by 11
- 2025Can Vision-Language Models Infer Speaker's Ignorance? The Role of Visual and Linguistic Cuescited by 0
- 2025Implicature in Interaction: Understanding Implicature Improves Alignment in Human-LLM Interactioncited by 0
- 2026Continuous Interpretive Steering for Scalar Diversitycited by 0
- 2026Evaluating Communicative Belief Updates in Large Language Models via Implicature Recognition and Cancellationcited by 0
- 2026Evaluating Communicative Belief Updates in Large Language Models via Implicature Recognition and Cancellation27 Jul 2026
- 2026Continuous Interpretive Steering for Scalar Diversity8 Apr 2026
- 2025Implicature in Interaction: Understanding Implicature Improves Alignment in Human-LLM Interaction29 Oct 2025
- 2025Are BabyLMs Deaf to Gricean Maxims? A Pragmatic Evaluation of Sample-efficient Language Models6 Oct 2025
- 2025Can Vision-Language Models Infer Speaker's Ignorance? The Role of Visual and Linguistic Cues13 Feb 2025