mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Centralized and Federated Heart Disease Classification Models Using UCI Dataset and their Shapley-value Based Interpretability

arXiv 2408.06183 ↗First posted 12 Aug 2024cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Cardiovascular diseases are a leading cause of mortality worldwide, highlighting the need for accurate diagnostic methods. This study benchmarks centralized and federated machine learning algorithms for heart disease classification using the UCI dataset which includes 920 patient records from four hospitals in the USA, Hungary and Switzerland. Our benchmark is supported by Shapley-value interpretability analysis to quantify features' importance for classification. In the centralized setup, various binary classification algorithms are trained on pooled data, with a support vector machine (SVM) achieving the highest testing accuracy of 83.3%, surpassing the established benchmark of 78.7% with logistic regression. Additionally, federated learning algorithms with four clients (hospitals) are explored, leveraging the dataset's natural partition to enhance privacy without sacrificing accuracy. Federated SVM, an uncommon approach in the literature, achieves a top testing accuracy of 73.8%. Our interpretability analysis aligns with existing medical knowledge of heart disease indicators. Overall, this study establishes a benchmark for efficient and interpretable pre-screening tools for heart disease while maintaining patients' privacy. This work is available at https://github.com/padillma1/Heart-Disease-Classification-on-UCI-dataset-and-Shapley-Interpretability-Analysis.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Aug 2024.

Builds on

21 of 49 references.

References · 21

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
  3. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  4. 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,046
  5. 2018Federated Optimization in Heterogeneous Networkscited by 2,987
  6. 2015Learning Deep Features for Discriminative Localizationcited by 2,436
  7. 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,552
  8. 2016Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiencycited by 1,475
  9. 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,416
  10. 2020Adaptive Federated Optimizationcited by 1,046
  11. 2019Measuring the Effects of Non-Identical Data Distribution for Federated Visual Classificationcited by 851
  12. 2017Federated Multi-Task Learningcited by 672
9 more
  1. 2020The Future of Digital Health with Federated Learningcited by 633
  2. 2020An Efficient Framework for Clustered Federated Learningcited by 511
  3. 2019Clustered Federated Learning: Model-Agnostic Distributed Multi-Task Optimization under Privacy Constraintscited by 503
  4. 2019Improving Federated Learning Personalization via Model Agnostic Meta Learningcited by 269
  5. 2021Federated Learning for Smart Healthcare: A Surveycited by 184
  6. 2022FLamby: Datasets and Benchmarks for Cross-Silo Federated Learning in Realistic Healthcare Settingscited by 125
  7. 2021The Federated Tumor Segmentation (FeTS) Challengecited by 50
  8. 2021Personalized Federated Learning for Heterogeneous Clients with Clustered Knowledge Transfercited by 23
  9. 2021Machine Learning-Based Heart Disease Diagnosis: A Systematic Literature Reviewcited by 18

Built on by

Not cited yet.