Coarse Graining with Neural Operators for Simulating Chaotic Systems
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Accurately predicting the long-term behavior of chaotic systems is crucial for various applications such as climate modeling. However, achieving such predictions typically requires iterative computations over a dense spatiotemporal grid to account for the unstable nature of chaotic systems, which is expensive and impractical in many real-world situations. An alternative approach to such a full-resolved simulation is using a coarse grid and then correcting its errors through a textitclosure model, which approximates the overall information from fine scales not captured in the coarse-grid simulation. Recently, ML approaches have been used for closure modeling, but they typically require a large number of training samples from expensive fully-resolved simulations (FRS). In this work, we prove an even more fundamental limitation, i.e., the standard approach to learning closure models suffers from a large approximation error for generic problems, no matter how large the model is, and it stems from the non-uniqueness of the mapping. We propose an alternative end-to-end learning approach using a physics-informed neural operator (PINO) that overcomes this limitation by not using a closure model or a coarse-grid solver. We first train the PINO model on data from a coarse-grid solver and then fine-tune it with (a small amount of) FRS and physics-based losses on a fine grid. The discretization-free nature of neural operators means that they do not suffer from the restriction of a coarse grid that closure models face, and they can provably approximate the long-term statistics of chaotic systems. In our experiments, our PINO model achieves a 330x speedup compared to FRS with a relative error ~ 10%. In contrast, the closure model coupled with a coarse-grid solver is 60x slower than PINO while having a much higher error ~186% when the closure model is trained on the same FRS dataset.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 9 Aug 2024.
Builds on
0 of 0 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 5; 2026: 1.
6 papers.
- 2025TensorGRaD: Tensor Gradient Robust Decomposition for Memory-Efficient Neural Operator Trainingcited by 6
- 2025Maximal Update Parametrization and Zero-Shot Hyperparameter Transfer for Fourier Neural Operatorscited by 1
- 2025An Analytical and AI-discovered Stable, Accurate, and Generalizable Subgrid-scale Closure for Geophysical Turbulencecited by 1
- 2025From Black Hole to Galaxy: Neural Operator: Framework for Accretion and Feedback Dynamicscited by 0
- 2025Resolution-Agnostic Neural Operators for Multi-Rate Sparse-View CTcited by 0
- 2026Pushing the Limits of High-Resolution Weather Forecasting through Data Scalingcited by 0
- 2026Pushing the Limits of High-Resolution Weather Forecasting through Data Scaling31 Jul 2026
- 2025Resolution-Agnostic Neural Operators for Multi-Rate Sparse-View CT13 Dec 2025
- 2025From Black Hole to Galaxy: Neural Operator: Framework for Accretion and Feedback Dynamics1 Dec 2025
- 2025An Analytical and AI-discovered Stable, Accurate, and Generalizable Subgrid-scale Closure for Geophysical Turbulence5 Sep 2025
- 2025Maximal Update Parametrization and Zero-Shot Hyperparameter Transfer for Fourier Neural Operators24 Jun 2025
- 2025TensorGRaD: Tensor Gradient Robust Decomposition for Memory-Efficient Neural Operator Training4 Jan 2025