TSC: A Simple Two-Sided Constraint against Over-Smoothing
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Graph Convolutional Neural Network (GCN), a widely adopted method for analyzing relational data, enhances node discriminability through the aggregation of neighboring information. Usually, stacking multiple layers can improve the performance of GCN by leveraging information from high-order neighbors. However, the increase of the network depth will induce the over-smoothing problem, which can be attributed to the quality and quantity of neighbors changing: (a) neighbor quality, node's neighbors become overlapping in high order, leading to aggregated information becoming indistinguishable, (b) neighbor quantity, the exponentially growing aggregated neighbors submerges the node's initial feature by recursively aggregating operations. Current solutions mainly focus on one of the above causes and seldom consider both at once. Aiming at tackling both causes of over-smoothing in one shot, we introduce a simple Two-Sided Constraint (TSC) for GCNs, comprising two straightforward yet potent techniques: random masking and contrastive constraint. The random masking acts on the representation matrix's columns to regulate the degree of information aggregation from neighbors, thus preventing the convergence of node representations. Meanwhile, the contrastive constraint, applied to the representation matrix's rows, enhances the discriminability of the nodes. Designed as a plug-in module, TSC can be easily coupled with GCN or SGC architectures. Experimental analyses on diverse real-world graph datasets verify that our approach markedly reduces the convergence of node's representation and the performance degradation in deeper GCN.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Aug 2024.
Builds on
26 of 40 references.
References · 26
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
- 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,282
- 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,854
- 2017Neural Message Passing for Quantum Chemistrycited by 3,460
- 2016Convolutional Neural Networks on Graphs with Fast Localized Spectral Filteringcited by 2,085
- 2019Simplifying Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 1,470
- 2018Deeper Insights into Graph Convolutional Networks for Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,099
- 2018Pitfalls of Graph Neural Network Evaluationcited by 994
- 2018Predict then Propagate: Graph Neural Networks meet Personalized PageRankcited by 987
- 2018Representation Learning on Graphs with Jumping Knowledge Networkscited by 875
- 2020Simple and Deep Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 857
- 2019DropEdge: Towards Deep Graph Convolutional Networks on Node Classificationcited by 679
14 more
- 2019Measuring and Relieving the Over-smoothing Problem for Graph Neural Networks from the Topological Viewcited by 544
- 2019DeepGCNs: Can GCNs Go as Deep as CNNs?cited by 527
- 2019PairNorm: Tackling Oversmoothing in GNNscited by 297
- 2020Graph Random Neural Network for Semi-Supervised Learning on Graphscited by 213
- 2022Representing Long-Range Context for Graph Neural Networks with Global Attentioncited by 193
- 2022Graph neural networks for materials science and chemistrycited by 181
- 2021UltraGCN: Ultra Simplification of Graph Convolutional Networks for Recommendationcited by 87
- 2022On the Trade-off between Over-smoothing and Over-squashing in Deep Graph Neural Networkscited by 63
- 2020ASGN: An Active Semi-supervised Graph Neural Network for Molecular Property Predictioncited by 58
- 2020Understanding and Resolving Performance Degradation in Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 53
- 2021Node Dependent Local Smoothing for Scalable Graph Learningcited by 45
- 2022DropMessage: Unifying Random Dropping for Graph Neural Networkscited by 29
- 2022Model Degradation Hinders Deep Graph Neural Networkscited by 26
- 2020Graph Convolutional Neural Networks with Node Transition Probability-based Message Passing and DropNode Regularizationcited by 15
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.
2 papers.