mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

LMEMs for post-hoc analysis of HPO Benchmarking

arXiv 2408.02533 ↗First posted 5 Aug 2024cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The importance of tuning hyperparameters in Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL) is established through empirical research and applications, evident from the increase in new hyperparameter optimization (HPO) algorithms and benchmarks steadily added by the community. However, current benchmarking practices using averaged performance across many datasets may obscure key differences between HPO methods, especially for pairwise comparisons. In this work, we apply Linear Mixed-Effect Models-based (LMEMs) significance testing for post-hoc analysis of HPO benchmarking runs. LMEMs allow flexible and expressive modeling on the entire experiment data, including information such as benchmark meta-features, offering deeper insights than current analysis practices. We demonstrate this through a case study on the PriorBand paper's experiment data to find insights not reported in the original work.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Aug 2024.

Builds on

6 of 24 references.

References · 6

  1. 2021HPOBench: A Collection of Reproducible Multi-Fidelity Benchmark Problems for HPOcited by 111
  2. 2021HPO-B: A Large-Scale Reproducible Benchmark for Black-Box HPO based on OpenMLcited by 75
  3. 2021Pre-trained Gaussian Processes for Bayesian Optimizationcited by 63
  4. 2021YAHPO Gym -- An Efficient Multi-Objective Multi-Fidelity Benchmark for Hyperparameter Optimizationcited by 61
  5. 2017Replicability Analysis for Natural Language Processing: Testing Significance with Multiple Datasetscited by 32
  6. 2023PriorBand: Practical Hyperparameter Optimization in the Age of Deep Learningcited by 31

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.