Generative Retrieval with Few-shot Indexing
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Existing generative retrieval (GR) methods rely on training-based indexing, which fine-tunes a model to memorise associations between queries and the document identifiers (docids) of relevant documents. Training-based indexing suffers from high training costs, under-utilisation of pre-trained knowledge in large language models (LLMs), and limited adaptability to dynamic document corpora. To address the issues, we propose a few-shot indexing-based GR framework (Few-Shot GR). It has a few-shot indexing process without any training, where we prompt an LLM to generate docids for all documents in a corpus, ultimately creating a docid bank for the entire corpus. During retrieval, we feed a query to the same LLM and constrain it to generate a docid within the docid bank created during indexing, and then map the generated docid back to its corresponding document. Moreover, we devise few-shot indexing with one-to-many mapping to further enhance Few-Shot GR. Experiments show that Few-Shot GR achieves superior performance to state-of-the-art GR methods requiring heavy training.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Aug 2024.
Builds on
29 of 42 references.
References · 29
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
- 2020Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 3,779
- 2016MS MARCO: A Human Generated MAchine Reading COmprehension Datasetcited by 1,591
- 2021BEIR: A Heterogenous Benchmark for Zero-shot Evaluation of Information Retrieval Modelscited by 1,225
- 2020Approximate Nearest Neighbor Negative Contrastive Learning for Dense Text Retrievalcited by 846
- 2023Zephyr: Direct Distillation of LM Alignmentcited by 498
- 2021Sentence-T5: Scalable Sentence Encoders from Pre-trained Text-to-Text Modelscited by 462
- 2021Large Dual Encoders Are Generalizable Retrieverscited by 454
- 2020Autoregressive Entity Retrievalcited by 333
- 2022Transformer Memory as a Differentiable Search Indexcited by 242
- 2022Autoregressive Search Engines: Generating Substrings as Document Identifierscited by 112
- 2022A Neural Corpus Indexer for Document Retrievalcited by 107
17 more
- 2024From Matching to Generation: A Survey on Generative Information Retrievalcited by 89
- 2023Learning to Tokenize for Generative Retrievalcited by 66
- 2022Bridging the Gap Between Indexing and Retrieval for Differentiable Search Index with Query Generationcited by 47
- 2023How Does Generative Retrieval Scale to Millions of Passages?cited by 47
- 2023Scalable and Effective Generative Information Retrievalcited by 38
- 2022DSI++: Updating Transformer Memory with New Documentscited by 35
- 2023Continual Learning for Generative Retrieval over Dynamic Corporacited by 25
- 2023TOME: A Two-stage Approach for Model-based Retrievalcited by 21
- 2024Planning Ahead in Generative Retrieval: Guiding Autoregressive Generation through Simultaneous Decodingcited by 19
- 2024CorpusLM: Towards a Unified Language Model on Corpus for Knowledge-Intensive Taskscited by 18
- 2024Query Performance Prediction using Relevance Judgments Generated by Large Language Modelscited by 18
- 2023GLEN: Generative Retrieval via Lexical Index Learningcited by 17
- 2023Query Performance Prediction: From Ad-hoc to Conversational Searchcited by 16
- 2024A Survey of Generative Search and Recommendation in the Era of Large Language Modelscited by 14
- 2023IncDSI: Incrementally Updatable Document Retrievalcited by 12
- 2024CorpusBrain++: A Continual Generative Pre-Training Framework for Knowledge-Intensive Language Taskscited by 9
- 2024A Survey of Generative Information Retrievalcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 3.
3 papers.