mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Reporting and Analysing the Environmental Impact of Language Models on the Example of Commonsense Question Answering with External Knowledge

arXiv 2408.01453 ↗First posted 24 Jul 2024cs.CY cs.AI cs.CLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Human-produced emissions are growing at an alarming rate, causing already observable changes in the climate and environment in general. Each year global carbon dioxide emissions hit a new record, and it is reported that 0.5% of total US greenhouse gas emissions are attributed to data centres as of 2021. The release of ChatGPT in late 2022 sparked social interest in Large Language Models (LLMs), the new generation of Language Models with a large number of parameters and trained on massive amounts of data. Currently, numerous companies are releasing products featuring various LLMs, with many more models in development and awaiting release. Deep Learning research is a competitive field, with only models that reach top performance attracting attention and being utilized. Hence, achieving better accuracy and results is often the first priority, while the model's efficiency and the environmental impact of the study are neglected. However, LLMs demand substantial computational resources and are very costly to train, both financially and environmentally. It becomes essential to raise awareness and promote conscious decisions about algorithmic and hardware choices. Providing information on training time, the approximate carbon dioxide emissions and power consumption would assist future studies in making necessary adjustments and determining the compatibility of available computational resources with model requirements. In this study, we infused T5 LLM with external knowledge and fine-tuned the model for Question-Answering task. Furthermore, we calculated and reported the approximate environmental impact for both steps. The findings demonstrate that the smaller models may not always be sustainable options, and increased training does not always imply better performance. The most optimal outcome is achieved by carefully considering both performance and efficiency factors.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Jul 2024.

Builds on

17 of 23 references.

References · 17

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
  3. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,512
  4. 2022BLOOM: A 176B-Parameter Open-Access Multilingual Language Modelcited by 1,984
  5. 2019Energy and Policy Considerations for Deep Learning in NLPcited by 1,254
  6. 2020BLEURT: Learning Robust Metrics for Text Generationcited by 1,203
  7. 2016ConceptNet 5.5: An Open Multilingual Graph of General Knowledgecited by 1,067
  8. 2021Carbon Emissions and Large Neural Network Trainingcited by 567
  9. 2019ERNIE: Enhanced Language Representation with Informative Entitiescited by 528
  10. 2019Quantifying the Carbon Emissions of Machine Learningcited by 521
  11. 2020UnifiedQA: Crossing Format Boundaries With a Single QA Systemcited by 476
  12. 2017Zero-Shot Relation Extraction via Reading Comprehensioncited by 426
5 more
  1. 2021Sustainable AI: Environmental Implications, Challenges and Opportunitiescited by 242
  2. 2020Carbontracker: Tracking and Predicting the Carbon Footprint of Training Deep Learning Modelscited by 169
  3. 2020A Knowledge-Enhanced Pretraining Model for Commonsense Story Generationcited by 116
  4. 2018Commonsense for Generative Multi-Hop Question Answering Taskscited by 48
  5. 2021TellMeWhy: A Dataset for Answering Why-Questions in Narrativescited by 27

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.