mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Prompt Refinement or Fine-tuning? Best Practices for using LLMs in Computational Social Science Tasks

arXiv 2408.01346 ↗First posted 2 Aug 2024cs.CY cs.CL physics.soc-phcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models are expressive tools that enable complex tasks of text understanding within Computational Social Science. Their versatility, while beneficial, poses a barrier for establishing standardized best practices within the field. To bring clarity on the values of different strategies, we present an overview of the performance of modern LLM-based classification methods on a benchmark of 23 social knowledge tasks. Our results point to three best practices: select models with larger vocabulary and pre-training corpora; avoid simple zero-shot in favor of AI-enhanced prompting; fine-tune on task-specific data, and consider more complex forms instruction-tuning on multiple datasets only when only training data is more abundant.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 14 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Aug 2024.

Builds on

7 of 14 references.

References · 7

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  2. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
  3. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
  4. 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,374
  5. 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,780
  6. 2022A Survey on Retrieval-Augmented Text Generationcited by 158
  7. 2023Do LLMs Understand Social Knowledge? Evaluating the Sociability of Large Language Models with SocKET Benchmarkcited by 63

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 3; 2026: 2.

6 papers.