Exploiting Preferences in Loss Functions for Sequential Recommendation via Weak Transitivity
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
A choice of optimization objective is immensely pivotal in the design of a recommender system as it affects the general modeling process of a user's intent from previous interactions. Existing approaches mainly adhere to three categories of loss functions: pairwise, pointwise, and setwise loss functions. Despite their effectiveness, a critical and common drawback of such objectives is viewing the next observed item as a unique positive while considering all remaining items equally negative. Such a binary label assignment is generally limited to assuring a higher recommendation score of the positive item, neglecting potential structures induced by varying preferences between other unobserved items. To alleviate this issue, we propose a novel method that extends original objectives to explicitly leverage the different levels of preferences as relative orders between their scores. Finally, we demonstrate the superior performance of our method compared to baseline objectives.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Aug 2024.
Builds on
27 of 36 references.
References · 27
- 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,777
- 2018Self-Attentive Sequential Recommendationcited by 1,184
- 2020LightGCN: Simplifying and Powering Graph Convolution Network for Recommendationcited by 1,139
- 2019BERT4Rec: Sequential Recommendation with Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformercited by 964
- 2015Image-based Recommendations on Styles and Substitutescited by 706
- 2015Session-based Recommendations with Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 695
- 2019Neural Graph Collaborative Filteringcited by 661
- 2018Personalized Top-N Sequential Recommendation via Convolutional Sequence Embeddingcited by 476
- 2020S^3-Rec: Self-Supervised Learning for Sequential Recommendation with Mutual Information Maximizationcited by 311
- 2020Self-supervised Graph Learning for Recommendationcited by 305
- 2022Filter-enhanced MLP is All You Need for Sequential Recommendationcited by 96
- 2021Sequential Recommendation with Graph Neural Networkscited by 89
15 more
- 2017IRGAN: A Minimax Game for Unifying Generative and Discriminative Information Retrieval Modelscited by 75
- 2017On Sampling Strategies for Neural Network-based Collaborative Filteringcited by 71
- 2021Continuous-Time Sequential Recommendation with Temporal Graph Collaborative Transformercited by 69
- 2018NSCaching: Simple and Efficient Negative Sampling for Knowledge Graph Embeddingcited by 42
- 2021Interest-aware Message-Passing GCN for Recommendationcited by 39
- 2022On the Effectiveness of Sampled Softmax Loss for Item Recommendationcited by 39
- 2020Contrastive Learning for Debiased Candidate Generation in Large-Scale Recommender Systemscited by 38
- 2022Sequential Recommendation via Stochastic Self-Attentioncited by 37
- 2020Simplify and Robustify Negative Sampling for Implicit Collaborative Filteringcited by 34
- 2018Incorporating GAN for Negative Sampling in Knowledge Representation Learningcited by 31
- 2023Turning Dross Into Gold Loss: is BERT4Rec really better than SASRec?cited by 30
- 2023gSASRec: Reducing Overconfidence in Sequential Recommendation Trained with Negative Samplingcited by 29
- 2023Heterogeneous Graph Contrastive Learning for Recommendationcited by 28
- 2023Fairly Adaptive Negative Sampling for Recommendationscited by 22
- 2022Generating Negative Samples for Sequential Recommendationcited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.