mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Vera Verto: Multimodal Hijacking Attack

arXiv 2408.00129 ↗First posted 31 Jul 2024cs.CR cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The increasing cost of training machine learning (ML) models has led to the inclusion of new parties to the training pipeline, such as users who contribute training data and companies that provide computing resources. This involvement of such new parties in the ML training process has introduced new attack surfaces for an adversary to exploit. A recent attack in this domain is the model hijacking attack, whereby an adversary hijacks a victim model to implement their own -- possibly malicious -- hijacking tasks. However, the scope of the model hijacking attack is so far limited to the homogeneous-modality tasks. In this paper, we transform the model hijacking attack into a more general multimodal setting, where the hijacking and original tasks are performed on data of different modalities. Specifically, we focus on the setting where an adversary implements a natural language processing (NLP) hijacking task into an image classification model. To mount the attack, we propose a novel encoder-decoder based framework, namely the Blender, which relies on advanced image and language models. Experimental results show that our modal hijacking attack achieves strong performances in different settings. For instance, our attack achieves 94%, 94%, and 95% attack success rate when using the Sogou news dataset to hijack STL10, CIFAR-10, and MNIST classifiers.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Jul 2024.

Builds on

23 of 32 references.

References · 23

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  3. 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,874
  4. 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,854
  5. 2018MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottleneckscited by 4,773
  6. 2015Character-level Convolutional Networks for Text Classificationcited by 2,293
  7. 2017Targeted Backdoor Attacks on Deep Learning Systems Using Data Poisoningcited by 1,012
  8. 2018Poison Frogs! Targeted Clean-Label Poisoning Attacks on Neural Networkscited by 500
  9. 2019How to Fine-Tune BERT for Text Classification?cited by 409
  10. 2019Hidden Trigger Backdoor Attackscited by 359
  11. 2017Certified Defenses for Data Poisoning Attackscited by 288
  12. 2020Data Poisoning Attacks Against Federated Learning Systemscited by 266
11 more
  1. 2018Manipulating Machine Learning: Poisoning Attacks and Countermeasures for Regression Learningcited by 219
  2. 2020BadNL: Backdoor Attacks against NLP Models with Semantic-preserving Improvementscited by 191
  3. 2020Clean-Label Backdoor Attacks on Video Recognition Modelscited by 162
  4. 2021Poisoning and Backdooring Contrastive Learningcited by 149
  5. 2020Dynamic Backdoor Attacks Against Machine Learning Modelscited by 147
  6. 2018Adversarial Reprogramming of Neural Networkscited by 115
  7. 2020You Autocomplete Me: Poisoning Vulnerabilities in Neural Code Completioncited by 112
  8. 2022Not All Poisons are Created Equal: Robust Training against Data Poisoningcited by 29
  9. 2020Practical Data Poisoning Attack against Next-Item Recommendationcited by 27
  10. 2018Data Poisoning Attack against Unsupervised Node Embedding Methodscited by 19
  11. 2021Get a Model! Model Hijacking Attack Against Machine Learning Modelscited by 13

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.