Beyond Metrics: A Critical Analysis of the Variability in Large Language Model Evaluation Frameworks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
As large language models (LLMs) continue to evolve, the need for robust and standardized evaluation benchmarks becomes paramount. Evaluating the performance of these models is a complex challenge that requires careful consideration of various linguistic tasks, model architectures, and benchmarking methodologies. In recent years, various frameworks have emerged as noteworthy contributions to the field, offering comprehensive evaluation tests and benchmarks for assessing the capabilities of LLMs across diverse domains. This paper provides an exploration and critical analysis of some of these evaluation methodologies, shedding light on their strengths, limitations, and impact on advancing the state-of-the-art in natural language processing.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jul 2024.
Builds on
13 of 17 references.
References · 13
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
- 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,854
- 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,018
- 2023A Survey of Large Language Modelscited by 2,537
- 2018Can a Suit of Armor Conduct Electricity? A New Dataset for Open Book Question Answeringcited by 2,114
- 2019SuperGlue: Learning Feature Matching with Graph Neural Networkscited by 1,437
- 2020What Disease does this Patient Have? A Large-scale Open Domain Question Answering Dataset from Medical Examscited by 1,324
- 2022Repairing the Cracked Foundation: A Survey of Obstacles in Evaluation Practices for Generated Textcited by 154
- 2023A Systematic Study and Comprehensive Evaluation of ChatGPT on Benchmark Datasetscited by 123
1 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
3 papers.