mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

High-Dimensional Fault Tolerance Testing of Highly Automated Vehicles Based on Low-Rank Models

arXiv 2407.21069 ↗First posted 28 Jul 2024cs.SE cs.AI cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Ensuring fault tolerance of Highly Automated Vehicles (HAVs) is crucial for their safety due to the presence of potentially severe faults. Hence, Fault Injection (FI) testing is conducted by practitioners to evaluate the safety level of HAVs. To fully cover test cases, various driving scenarios and fault settings should be considered. However, due to numerous combinations of test scenarios and fault settings, the testing space can be complex and high-dimensional. In addition, evaluating performance in all newly added scenarios is resource-consuming. The rarity of critical faults that can cause security problems further strengthens the challenge. To address these challenges, we propose to accelerate FI testing under the low-rank Smoothness Regularized Matrix Factorization (SRMF) framework. We first organize the sparse evaluated data into a structured matrix based on its safety values. Then the untested values are estimated by the correlation captured by the matrix structure. To address high dimensionality, a low-rank constraint is imposed on the testing space. To exploit the relationships between existing scenarios and new scenarios and capture the local regularity of critical faults, three types of smoothness regularization are further designed as a complement. We conduct experiments on car following and cut in scenarios. The results indicate that SRMF has the lowest prediction error in various scenarios and is capable of predicting rare critical faults compared to other machine learning models. In addition, SRMF can achieve 1171 acceleration rate, 99.3% precision and 91.1% F1 score in identifying critical faults. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work to introduce low-rank models to FI testing of HAVs.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Jul 2024.

Builds on

9 of 29 references.

References · 9

  1. 2023ImputeFormer: Low Rankness-Induced Transformers for Generalizable Spatiotemporal Imputationcited by 50
  2. 2022Correlating sparse sensing for large-scale traffic speed estimation: A Laplacian-enhanced low-rank tensor kriging approachcited by 17
  3. 2019ML-based Fault Injection for Autonomous Vehicles: A Case for Bayesian Fault Injectioncited by 16
  4. 2022Truncated tensor Schatten p-norm based approach for spatiotemporal traffic data imputation with complicated missing patternscited by 11
  5. 2020ML-driven Malware that Targets AV Safetycited by 9
  6. 2024Spatiotemporal Implicit Neural Representation as a Generalized Traffic Data Learnercited by 7
  7. 2019Leveraging Low-Rank Relations Between Surrogate Tasks in Structured Predictioncited by 5
  8. 2022Forecasting Sparse Movement Speed of Urban Road Networks with Nonstationary Temporal Matrix Factorizationcited by 5
  9. 2019Kayotee: A Fault Injection-based System to Assess the Safety and Reliability of Autonomous Vehicles to Faults and Errorscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.