mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

What Matters in Explanations: Towards Explainable Fake Review Detection Focusing on Transformers

arXiv 2407.21056 ↗First posted 24 Jul 2024cs.CL cs.IR cs.SIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Customers' reviews and feedback play crucial role on electronic commerce~(E-commerce) platforms like Amazon, Zalando, and eBay in influencing other customers' purchasing decisions. However, there is a prevailing concern that sellers often post fake or spam reviews to deceive potential customers and manipulate their opinions about a product. Over the past decade, there has been considerable interest in using machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) models to identify such fraudulent reviews. Unfortunately, the decisions made by complex ML and DL models - which often function as black-boxes - can be surprising and difficult for general users to comprehend. In this paper, we propose an explainable framework for detecting fake reviews with high precision in identifying fraudulent content with explanations and investigate what information matters most for explaining particular decisions by conducting empirical user evaluation. Initially, we develop fake review detection models using DL and transformer models including XLNet and DistilBERT. We then introduce layer-wise relevance propagation (LRP) technique for generating explanations that can map the contributions of words toward the predicted class. The experimental results on two benchmark fake review detection datasets demonstrate that our predictive models achieve state-of-the-art performance and outperform several existing methods. Furthermore, the empirical user evaluation of the generated explanations concludes which important information needs to be considered in generating explanations in the context of fake review identification.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Jul 2024.

Builds on

15 of 48 references.

References · 15

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
  3. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  4. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  5. 2019DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lightercited by 4,243
  6. 2019XLNet: Generalized Autoregressive Pretraining for Language Understandingcited by 2,801
  7. 2019Transformer-XL: Attentive Language Models Beyond a Fixed-Length Contextcited by 1,830
  8. 2017Explaining Recurrent Neural Network Predictions in Sentiment Analysiscited by 87
  9. 2016"What is Relevant in a Text Document?": An Interpretable Machine Learning Approachcited by 53
  10. 2020DeepHateExplainer: Explainable Hate Speech Detection in Under-resourced Bengali Languagecited by 26
  11. 2020Towards Interpreting BERT for Reading Comprehension Based QAcited by 13
  12. 2019A framework for fake review detection in online consumer electronics retailerscited by 11
3 more
  1. 2022Explainable AI for Bioinformatics: Methods, Tools, and Applicationscited by 11
  2. 2023Online Fake Review Detection Using Supervised Machine Learning And BERT Modelcited by 2
  3. 2023Unveiling Black-boxes: Explainable Deep Learning Models for Patent Classificationcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.