mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Efficient Multi-Objective Neural Architecture Search via Pareto Dominance-based Novelty Search

arXiv 2407.20656 ↗First posted 30 Jul 2024cs.NE cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Neural Architecture Search (NAS) aims to automate the discovery of high-performing deep neural network architectures. Traditional objective-based NAS approaches typically optimize a certain performance metric (e.g., prediction accuracy), overlooking large parts of the architecture search space that potentially contain interesting network configurations. Furthermore, objective-driven population-based metaheuristics in complex search spaces often quickly exhaust population diversity and succumb to premature convergence to local optima. This issue becomes more complicated in NAS when performance objectives do not fully align with the actual performance of the candidate architectures, as is often the case with training-free metrics. While training-free metrics have gained popularity for their rapid performance estimation of candidate architectures without incurring computation-heavy network training, their effective incorporation into NAS remains a challenge. This paper presents the Pareto Dominance-based Novelty Search for multi-objective NAS with Multiple Training-Free metrics (MTF-PDNS). Unlike conventional NAS methods that optimize explicit objectives, MTF-PDNS promotes population diversity by utilizing a novelty score calculated based on multiple training-free performance and complexity metrics, thereby yielding a broader exploration of the search space. Experimental results on standard NAS benchmark suites demonstrate that MTF-PDNS outperforms conventional methods driven by explicit objectives in terms of convergence speed, diversity maintenance, architecture transferability, and computational costs.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Jul 2024.

Builds on

18 of 39 references.

References · 18

  1. 2018Regularized Evolution for Image Classifier Architecture Searchcited by 902
  2. 2018Efficient Neural Architecture Search via Parameter Sharingcited by 831
  3. 2018SNIP: Single-shot Network Pruning based on Connection Sensitivitycited by 802
  4. 2020Pruning neural networks without any data by iteratively conserving synaptic flowcited by 475
  5. 2020NAS-Bench-201: Extending the Scope of Reproducible Neural Architecture Searchcited by 412
  6. 2019NAS-Bench-101: Towards Reproducible Neural Architecture Searchcited by 340
  7. 2020Neural Architecture Search without Trainingcited by 241
  8. 2020pymoo: Multi-objective Optimization in Pythoncited by 196
  9. 2021Zero-Cost Proxies for Lightweight NAScited by 194
  10. 2023Neural Architecture Search: Insights from 1000 Paperscited by 136
  11. 2020NSGANetV2: Evolutionary Multi-Objective Surrogate-Assisted Neural Architecture Searchcited by 75
  12. 2020Evaluating Efficient Performance Estimators of Neural Architecturescited by 54
6 more
  1. 2022NAS-Bench-Suite-Zero: Accelerating Research on Zero Cost Proxiescited by 36
  2. 2020Evolving Neural Architecture Using One Shot Modelcited by 8
  3. 2022PRE-NAS: Predictor-assisted Evolutionary Neural Architecture Searchcited by 8
  4. 2013Evolution of Swarm Robotics Systems with Novelty Searchcited by 7
  5. 2022Neural Architecture Search using Progressive Evolutioncited by 3
  6. 2022Novelty Driven Evolutionary Neural Architecture Searchcited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.