mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

From A-to-Z Review of Clustering Validation Indices

arXiv 2407.20246 ↗First posted 18 Jul 2024cs.LGcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Data clustering involves identifying latent similarities within a dataset and organizing them into clusters or groups. The outcomes of various clustering algorithms differ as they are susceptible to the intrinsic characteristics of the original dataset, including noise and dimensionality. The effectiveness of such clustering procedures directly impacts the homogeneity of clusters, underscoring the significance of evaluating algorithmic outcomes. Consequently, the assessment of clustering quality presents a significant and complex endeavor. A pivotal aspect affecting clustering validation is the cluster validity metric, which aids in determining the optimal number of clusters. The main goal of this study is to comprehensively review and explain the mathematical operation of internal and external cluster validity indices, but not all, to categorize these indices and to brainstorm suggestions for future advancement of clustering validation research. In addition, we review and evaluate the performance of internal and external clustering validation indices on the most common clustering algorithms, such as the evolutionary clustering algorithm star (ECA*). Finally, we suggest a classification framework for examining the functionality of both internal and external clustering validation measures regarding their ideal values, user-friendliness, responsiveness to input data, and appropriateness across various fields. This classification aids researchers in selecting the appropriate clustering validation measure to suit their specific requirements.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 113 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Jul 2024.

Builds on

17 of 113 references.

References · 17

  1. 2017Hierarchical Clustering: Objective Functions and Algorithmscited by 60
  2. 2016Clustering Algorithms: A Comparative Approachcited by 28
  3. 2016Ground Truth Bias in External Cluster Validity Indicescited by 10
  4. 2020CSCF: a chaotic sine cosine firefly Algorithm for practical application problemscited by 7
  5. 2019Operational Framework for Recent Advances in Backtracking Search Optimisation Algorithm: A Systematic Review and Performance Evaluationcited by 6
  6. 2021A Multi-disciplinary Ensemble Algorithm for Clustering Heterogeneous Datasetscited by 5
  7. 2021An Optimized Framework to Adopt Computer Laboratory Administrations for Operating System and Application Installationscited by 5
  8. 2021Evaluating e-Government Services in Kurdistan Institution for Strategic Studies and Scientific Research Using the EGOVSAT Modelcited by 5
  9. 2021Performance evaluation results of evolutionary clustering algorithm star for clustering heterogeneous datasetscited by 5
  10. 2021A New Framework to Adopt Multidimensional Databases for Organizational Information System Strategiescited by 5
  11. 2021A Novel Cluster Detection of COVID-19 Patients and Medical Disease Conditions Using Improved Evolutionary Clustering Algorithm Starcited by 5
  12. 2021Towards Semantic Web: Challenges and Needscited by 4
5 more
  1. 2021Analysis for the Overwhelming Success of the Web Compared to Microcosm and Hyper-G Systemscited by 4
  2. 2021Formal context reduction in deriving concept hierarchies from corpora using adaptive evolutionary clustering algorithm starcited by 4
  3. 2020Next word prediction based on the N-gram model for Kurdish Sorani and Kurmanjicited by 3
  4. 2022Current Studies and Applications of Shuffled Frog Leaping Algorithm: A Reviewcited by 2
  5. 2018Cluster validity index based on Jeffrey divergencecited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 3; 2026: 6.

11 papers.