mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Shapley Value Computation in Ontology-Mediated Query Answering

arXiv 2407.20058 ↗First posted 29 Jul 2024cs.AI cs.DBcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The Shapley value was originally introduced in cooperative game theory as a wealth distribution mechanism. It has since found use in knowledge representation and databases for the purpose of assigning scores to formulas and database tuples based upon their contribution to obtaining a query result or inconsistency. The application of the Shapley value outside of its original setting relies upon defining a numeric wealth function that captures the phenomenon of interest. In the case of database queries, recent work has focused on the so-called drastic Shapley value, obtained by translating a Boolean query into a 0/1 function based upon whether the query is satisfied or not. The present paper explores the use of the drastic Shapley value in the context of ontology-mediated query answering (OMQA). We present a detailed complexity analysis of the drastic Shapley value computation (SVCdr) problem in the OMQA setting. In particular, we establish a dichotomy result that shows that for every ontology-mediated query (T,q) composed of an ontology T formulated in the description logic ELHI_bot and a connected constant-free homomorphism-closed query q the corresponding SVCdr problem is either tractable (in FP) or #P-hard. We further show how the #P-hardness side of the dichotomy can be strengthened to cover possibly disconnected queries with constants. Our results exploit recently discovered connections between SVCdr and probabilistic query evaluation and allow us to generalize existing results on probabilistic OMQA.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jul 2024.

Builds on

19 of 53 references.

References · 19

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  2. 2019The Shapley Value of Tuples in Query Answeringcited by 23
  3. 2014The DL-Lite Family and Relationscited by 20
  4. 2021Computing the Shapley Value of Facts in Query Answeringcited by 11
  5. 2024The Shapley Value in Database Managementcited by 11
  6. 2016Quantifying Causal Effects on Query Answering in Databasescited by 10
  7. 2020The Shapley Value of Inconsistency Measures for Functional Dependenciescited by 8
  8. 2023When is Shapley Value Computation a Matter of Counting?cited by 8
  9. 2023From Shapley Value to Model Counting and Backcited by 7
  10. 2019The Impact of Negation on the Complexity of the Shapley Value in Conjunctive Queriescited by 6
  11. 2022Explaining Ontology-Mediated Query Answers using Proofs over Universal Models (Technical Report)cited by 6
  12. 2023Banzhaf Values for Facts in Query Answeringcited by 6
7 more
  1. 2018The Data Complexity of Ontology-Mediated Queries with Closed Predicatescited by 5
  2. 2022The Complexity of the Shapley Value for Regular Path Queriescited by 5
  3. 2020First Order-Rewritability and Containment of Conjunctive Queries in Horn Description Logicscited by 3
  4. 2019A Complete Classification of the Complexity and Rewritability of Ontology-Mediated Queries based on the Description Logic ELcited by 2
  5. 2019Uniform Reliability of Self-Join-Free Conjunctive Queriescited by 2
  6. 2020A Dichotomy for the Generalized Model Counting Problem for Unions of Conjunctive Queriescited by 2
  7. 2022Uniform Reliability for Unbounded Homomorphism-Closed Graph Queriescited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

4 papers.