Prompt Injection Attacks on Large Language Models in Oncology
On the map: LLM safety and security → Safety alignment, refusal and guardrails
Abstract (arXiv)
Vision-language artificial intelligence models (VLMs) possess medical knowledge and can be employed in healthcare in numerous ways, including as image interpreters, virtual scribes, and general decision support systems. However, here, we demonstrate that current VLMs applied to medical tasks exhibit a fundamental security flaw: they can be attacked by prompt injection attacks, which can be used to output harmful information just by interacting with the VLM, without any access to its parameters. We performed a quantitative study to evaluate the vulnerabilities to these attacks in four state of the art VLMs which have been proposed to be of utility in healthcare: Claude 3 Opus, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, Reka Core, and GPT-4o. Using a set of N=297 attacks, we show that all of these models are susceptible. Specifically, we show that embedding sub-visual prompts in medical imaging data can cause the model to provide harmful output, and that these prompts are non-obvious to human observers. Thus, our study demonstrates a key vulnerability in medical VLMs which should be mitigated before widespread clinical adoption.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Safety alignment, refusal and guardrails, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. First posted on arXiv 23 Jul 2024.
Builds on
0 of 0 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 3; 2026: 3.
8 papers.
- 2026The Landscape of Prompt Injection Threats in LLM Agents: From Taxonomy to Analysiscited by 30
- 2025MedSentry: Understanding and Mitigating Safety Risks in Medical LLM Multi-Agent Systemscited by 9
- 2024Palisade -- Prompt Injection Detection Frameworkcited by 5
- 2024Beyond Multiple-Choice Accuracy: Real-World Challenges of Implementing Large Language Models in Healthcarecited by 4
- 2025Semantic-Preserving Prompt Hijacking: A Black-Box Adversarial Attack on Auto-Prompt Optimizationcited by 3
- 2025Manipulating Transformer-Based Models: Controllability, Steerability, and Robust Interventionscited by 2
- 2026Goal-Driven Risk Assessment for LLM-Powered Systems: A Healthcare Case Studycited by 0
- 2026Where Do LLM-based Systems Break? A System-Level Security Framework for Risk Assessment and Treatmentcited by 0
- 2026Where Do LLM-based Systems Break? A System-Level Security Framework for Risk Assessment and Treatment8 Mar 2026
- 2026Goal-Driven Risk Assessment for LLM-Powered Systems: A Healthcare Case Study4 Mar 2026
- 2026The Landscape of Prompt Injection Threats in LLM Agents: From Taxonomy to Analysis11 Feb 2026
- 2025Manipulating Transformer-Based Models: Controllability, Steerability, and Robust Interventions4 Sep 2025
- 2025MedSentry: Understanding and Mitigating Safety Risks in Medical LLM Multi-Agent Systems27 May 2025
- 2025Semantic-Preserving Prompt Hijacking: A Black-Box Adversarial Attack on Auto-Prompt Optimization26 May 2025
- 2024Palisade -- Prompt Injection Detection Framework28 Oct 2024
- 2024Beyond Multiple-Choice Accuracy: Real-World Challenges of Implementing Large Language Models in Healthcare24 Oct 2024
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025VSF-Med:A Vulnerability Scoring Framework for Medical Vision-Language Models
- 2025Enhancing the Safety of Medical Vision-Language Models by Synthetic Demonstrations
- 2025Vision Language Models in Medicine
- 2024Demonstration of an Adversarial Attack Against a Multimodal Vision Language Model for Pathology Imaging
- 2024Medical MLLM is Vulnerable: Cross-Modality Jailbreak and Mismatched Attacks on Medical Multimodal Large Language Models
- 2026When Background Matters: Breaking Medical Vision Language Models by Transferable Attack
- 2025Text Prompt Injection of Vision Language Models
- 2024PromptSmooth: Certifying Robustness of Medical Vision-Language Models via Prompt Learning