mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Survey on Cell Nuclei Instance Segmentation and Classification: Leveraging Context and Attention

arXiv 2407.18673 ↗First posted 26 Jul 2024cs.CV cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Manually annotating nuclei from the gigapixel Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E)-stained Whole Slide Images (WSIs) is a laborious and costly task, meaning automated algorithms for cell nuclei instance segmentation and classification could alleviate the workload of pathologists and clinical researchers and at the same time facilitate the automatic extraction of clinically interpretable features. But due to high intra- and inter-class variability of nuclei morphological and chromatic features, as well as H&E-stains susceptibility to artefacts, state-of-the-art algorithms cannot correctly detect and classify instances with the necessary performance. In this work, we hypothesise context and attention inductive biases in artificial neural networks (ANNs) could increase the generalization of algorithms for cell nuclei instance segmentation and classification. We conduct a thorough survey on context and attention methods for cell nuclei instance segmentation and classification from H&E-stained microscopy imaging, while providing a comprehensive discussion of the challenges being tackled with context and attention. Besides, we illustrate some limitations of current approaches and present ideas for future research. As a case study, we extend both a general instance segmentation and classification method (Mask-RCNN) and a tailored cell nuclei instance segmentation and classification model (HoVer-Net) with context- and attention-based mechanisms, and do a comparative analysis on a multi-centre colon nuclei identification and counting dataset. Although pathologists rely on context at multiple levels while paying attention to specific Regions of Interest (RoIs) when analysing and annotating WSIs, our findings suggest translating that domain knowledge into algorithm design is no trivial task, but to fully exploit these mechanisms, the scientific understanding of these methods should be addressed.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 128 of its 296 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Jul 2024.

Builds on

128 of 296 references.

References · 128

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  3. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
  4. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  5. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,082
  6. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
  7. 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,617
  8. 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,482
  9. 2020End-to-End Object Detection with Transformerscited by 7,384
  10. 2017Mask R-CNNcited by 7,259
  11. 2016Feature Pyramid Networks for Object Detectioncited by 5,021
  12. 2015You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detectioncited by 4,829
38 more
  1. 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,712
  2. 2020Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attentioncited by 4,560
  3. 2016Gaussian Error Linear Units (GELUs)cited by 3,431
  4. 2018Encoder-Decoder with Atrous Separable Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 3,210
  5. 2020Exploring Simple Siamese Representation Learningcited by 2,853
  6. 2016Aggregated Residual Transformations for Deep Neural Networkscited by 2,540
  7. 2018CBAM: Convolutional Block Attention Modulecited by 2,463
  8. 2021Masked-attention Mask Transformer for Universal Image Segmentationcited by 2,338
  9. 2020Improved Baselines with Momentum Contrastive Learningcited by 2,282
  10. 2019RandAugment: Practical automated data augmentation with a reduced search spacecited by 2,261
  11. 2019Invariant Risk Minimizationcited by 1,832
  12. 2021Barlow Twins: Self-Supervised Learning via Redundancy Reductioncited by 1,818
  13. 2021TransUNet: Transformers Make Strong Encoders for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 1,552
  14. 2018Learning deep representations by mutual information estimation and maximizationcited by 1,265
  15. 2019Class-Balanced Loss Based on Effective Number of Samplescited by 1,239
  16. 2021Per-Pixel Classification is Not All You Need for Semantic Segmentationcited by 1,148
  17. 2021Geometric Deep Learning: Grids, Groups, Graphs, Geodesics, and Gaugescited by 1,131
  18. 2021VICReg: Variance-Invariance-Covariance Regularization for Self-Supervised Learningcited by 1,013
  19. 2021Transformers in Vision: A Surveycited by 1,009
  20. 2021CvT: Introducing Convolutions to Vision Transformerscited by 946
  21. 2019Self-Supervised Learning of Pretext-Invariant Representationscited by 806
  22. 2018Panoptic Segmentationcited by 796
  23. 2018CCNet: Criss-Cross Attention for Semantic Segmentationcited by 717
  24. 2021Do Vision Transformers See Like Convolutional Neural Networks?cited by 671
  25. 2021MobileViT: Light-weight, General-purpose, and Mobile-friendly Vision Transformercited by 636
  26. 2021How to train your ViT? Data, Augmentation, and Regularization in Vision Transformerscited by 562
  27. 2021TransMIL: Transformer based Correlated Multiple Instance Learning for Whole Slide Image Classificationcited by 549
  28. 2015Causal inference using invariant prediction: identification and confidence intervalscited by 533
  29. 2019Using Self-Supervised Learning Can Improve Model Robustness and Uncertaintycited by 511
  30. 2021Intriguing Properties of Vision Transformerscited by 446
  31. 2019Confident Learning: Estimating Uncertainty in Dataset Labelscited by 411
  32. 2021Conditional Positional Encodings for Vision Transformerscited by 402
  33. 2021Early Convolutions Help Transformers See Bettercited by 395
  34. 2018HoVer-Net: Simultaneous Segmentation and Classification of Nuclei in Multi-Tissue Histology Imagescited by 387
  35. 2019Axial Attention in Multidimensional Transformerscited by 350
  36. 20183D MRI brain tumor segmentation using autoencoder regularizationcited by 324
  37. 2021Big Self-Supervised Models Advance Medical Image Classificationcited by 320
  38. 2020Improving Reproducibility in Machine Learning Research (A Report from the NeurIPS 2019 Reproducibility Program)cited by 318

50 most cited of 128 All 128 (JSON)

Built on by

Not cited yet.