Dataset Distribution Impacts Model Fairness: Single vs. Multi-Task Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The influence of bias in datasets on the fairness of model predictions is a topic of ongoing research in various fields. We evaluate the performance of skin lesion classification using ResNet-based CNNs, focusing on patient sex variations in training data and three different learning strategies. We present a linear programming method for generating datasets with varying patient sex and class labels, taking into account the correlations between these variables. We evaluated the model performance using three different learning strategies: a single-task model, a reinforcing multi-task model, and an adversarial learning scheme. Our observations include: 1) sex-specific training data yields better results, 2) single-task models exhibit sex bias, 3) the reinforcement approach does not remove sex bias, 4) the adversarial model eliminates sex bias in cases involving only female patients, and 5) datasets that include male patients enhance model performance for the male subgroup, even when female patients are the majority. To generalise these findings, in future research, we will examine more demographic attributes, like age, and other possibly confounding factors, such as skin colour and artefacts in the skin lesions. We make all data and models available on GitHub.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Jul 2024.
Builds on
17 of 35 references.
References · 17
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
- 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,969
- 2019Skin Lesion Analysis Toward Melanoma Detection 2018: A Challenge Hosted by the International Skin Imaging Collaboration (ISIC)cited by 669
- 2019BCN20000: Dermoscopic Lesions in the Wildcited by 225
- 2016Skin Lesion Analysis toward Melanoma Detection: A Challenge at the International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) 2016, hosted by the International Skin Imaging Collaboration (ISIC)cited by 198
- 2021Evaluating Deep Neural Networks Trained on Clinical Images in Dermatology with the Fitzpatrick 17k Datasetcited by 185
- 2021Reading Race: AI Recognises Patient's Racial Identity In Medical Imagescited by 156
- 2020A Patient-Centric Dataset of Images and Metadata for Identifying Melanomas Using Clinical Contextcited by 146
- 2022FairPrune: Achieving Fairness Through Pruning for Dermatological Disease Diagnosiscited by 59
- 2020Debiasing Skin Lesion Datasets and Models? Not So Fastcited by 43
- 2022Towards Transparency in Dermatology Image Datasets with Skin Tone Annotations by Experts, Crowds, and an Algorithmcited by 35
5 more
- 2020Risk of Training Diagnostic Algorithms on Data with Demographic Biascited by 23
- 2022Detecting Shortcuts in Medical Images -- A Case Study in Chest X-rayscited by 20
- 2022Feature robustness and sex differences in medical imaging: a case study in MRI-based Alzheimer's disease detectioncited by 19
- 2021Skin Deep Unlearning: Artefact and Instrument Debiasing in the Context of Melanoma Classificationcited by 18
- 2022Multi-Task Adversarial Learning for Treatment Effect Estimation in Basket Trialscited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.