SimCT: A Simple Consistency Test Protocol in LLMs Development Lifecycle
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In this work, we report our efforts to advance the standard operation procedure of developing Large Language Models (LLMs) or LLMs-based systems or services in industry. We introduce the concept of Large Language Model Development Lifecycle (LDLC) and then highlight the importance of consistency test in ensuring the delivery quality. The principled solution of consistency test, however, is usually overlooked by industrial practitioners and not urgent in academia, and current practical solutions are insufficiently rigours and labor-intensive. We thus propose a simple yet effective consistency test protocol, named SimCT. SimCT is mainly to proactively check the consistency across different development stages of "bare metal" LLMs or associated services without accessing the model artifacts, in an attempt to expedite the delivery by reducing the back-and-forth alignment communications among multiple teams involved in different development stages. Specifically, SimCT encompasses response-wise and model-wise tests. We implement the protocol with LightGBM and Student's t-test for two components respectively, and perform extensive experiments to substantiate the effectiveness of SimCT and the involved components.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Jul 2024.
Builds on
17 of 35 references.
References · 17
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
- 2021RoFormer: Enhanced Transformer with Rotary Position Embeddingcited by 4,581
- 2023Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4cited by 2,579
- 2023Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 2,185
- 2021GLM: General Language Model Pretraining with Autoregressive Blank Infillingcited by 1,026
- 2023Baichuan 2: Open Large-scale Language Modelscited by 664
- 2023Can AI-Generated Text be Reliably Detected?cited by 372
- 2023Efficient and Effective Text Encoding for Chinese LLaMA and Alpacacited by 302
- 2023Universal Self-Consistency for Large Language Model Generationcited by 198
- 2019Gradio: Hassle-Free Sharing and Testing of ML Models in the Wildcited by 176
5 more
- 2022Human heuristics for AI-generated language are flawedcited by 104
- 2022Evaluating the Factual Consistency of Large Language Models Through News Summarizationcited by 90
- 2022Measuring Reliability of Large Language Models through Semantic Consistencycited by 38
- 2022What Makes Pre-trained Language Models Better Zero-shot Learners?cited by 23
- 2021LMdiff: A Visual Diff Tool to Compare Language Modelscited by 17
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.
1 paper.