SepsisLab: Early Sepsis Prediction with Uncertainty Quantification and Active Sensing
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Sepsis is the leading cause of in-hospital mortality in the USA. Early sepsis onset prediction and diagnosis could significantly improve the survival of sepsis patients. Existing predictive models are usually trained on high-quality data with few missing information, while missing values widely exist in real-world clinical scenarios (especially in the first hours of admissions to the hospital), which causes a significant decrease in accuracy and an increase in uncertainty for the predictive models. The common method to handle missing values is imputation, which replaces the unavailable variables with estimates from the observed data. The uncertainty of imputation results can be propagated to the sepsis prediction outputs, which have not been studied in existing works on either sepsis prediction or uncertainty quantification. In this study, we first define such propagated uncertainty as the variance of prediction output and then introduce uncertainty propagation methods to quantify the propagated uncertainty. Moreover, for the potential high-risk patients with low confidence due to limited observations, we propose a robust active sensing algorithm to increase confidence by actively recommending clinicians to observe the most informative variables. We validate the proposed models in both publicly available data (i.e., MIMIC-III and AmsterdamUMCdb) and proprietary data in The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center (OSUWMC). The experimental results show that the propagated uncertainty is dominant at the beginning of admissions to hospitals and the proposed algorithm outperforms state-of-the-art active sensing methods. Finally, we implement a SepsisLab system for early sepsis prediction and active sensing based on our pre-trained models. Clinicians and potential sepsis patients can benefit from the system in early prediction and diagnosis of sepsis.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Jul 2024.
Builds on
10 of 59 references.
References · 10
- 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,352
- 2017Virtual Adversarial Training: A Regularization Method for Supervised and Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 920
- 2020A Review of Uncertainty Quantification in Deep Learning: Techniques, Applications and Challengescited by 819
- 2018BRITS: Bidirectional Recurrent Imputation for Time Seriescited by 290
- 2018Robustness via curvature regularization, and vice versacited by 175
- 2019Adversarial Robustness through Local Linearizationcited by 146
- 2019ASAC: Active Sensing using Actor-Critic modelscited by 13
- 2020Inverse Active Sensing: Modeling and Understanding Timely Decision-Makingcited by 12
- 2019Identifying Sub-Phenotypes of Acute Kidney Injury using Structured and Unstructured Electronic Health Record Data with Memory Networkscited by 10
- 2019On Classifying Sepsis Heterogeneity in the ICU: Insight Using Machine Learningcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2.
3 papers.
- 2024SepsisCalc: Integrating Clinical Calculators into Early Sepsis Prediction via Dynamic Temporal Graph Constructioncited by 4
- 2025Towards Unveiling Predictive Uncertainty Vulnerabilities in the Context of the Right to Be Forgottencited by 3
- 2025DE3S: Dual-Enhanced Soft-Sparse-Shape Learning for Medical Early Time-Series Classificationcited by 2
- 2025DE3S: Dual-Enhanced Soft-Sparse-Shape Learning for Medical Early Time-Series Classification14 Oct 2025
- 2025Towards Unveiling Predictive Uncertainty Vulnerabilities in the Context of the Right to Be Forgotten10 Aug 2025
- 2024SepsisCalc: Integrating Clinical Calculators into Early Sepsis Prediction via Dynamic Temporal Graph Construction31 Dec 2024