A Voter-Based Stochastic Rejection-Method Framework for Asymptotically Safe Language Model Outputs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We propose an approach for preventing unsafe or otherwise low-quality large language model (LLM) outputs by leveraging the stochasticity of LLMs, an approach we call Repeated Checking with Regeneration (RCR). In this system, LLM checkers vote on the acceptability of a generated output, regenerating it if a threshold of disapproval is reached, until sufficient checkers approve. Based on our estimators for cost and failure rate and experimental data tailored to the application, our algorithm achieves a desired expected failure rate at Pareto-optimal cost. The failure rate provably decreases exponentially as a function of cost, and the models reasonably estimate the actual performance of such a system in action, even with limited data. This approach does not depend on the language model used, and could allow cheap, small LLMs to control, constrain, or at some tasks even outperform very complex and costly ones.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Jul 2024.
Builds on
10 of 18 references.
References · 10
- 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
- 2022Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generationcited by 2,056
- 2023AutoGen: Enabling Next-Gen LLM Applications via Multi-Agent Conversationcited by 1,906
- 2023ChatEval: Towards Better LLM-based Evaluators through Multi-Agent Debatecited by 724
- 2023Low-Resource Languages Jailbreak GPT-4cited by 290
- 2023Large Language Model Guided Tree-of-Thoughtcited by 218
- 2024AutoDefense: Multi-Agent LLM Defense against Jailbreak Attackscited by 135
- 2023Deception Abilities Emerged in Large Language Modelscited by 99
- 2023Do LLM Agents Exhibit Social Behavior?cited by 53
- 2023Where's the Liability in Harmful AI Speech?cited by 12
Built on by
Not cited yet.