mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Machine Translation Hallucination Detection for Low and High Resource Languages using Large Language Models

arXiv 2407.16470 ↗First posted 23 Jul 2024cs.CL cs.AIcited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent advancements in massively multilingual machine translation systems have significantly enhanced translation accuracy; however, even the best performing systems still generate hallucinations, severely impacting user trust. Detecting hallucinations in Machine Translation (MT) remains a critical challenge, particularly since existing methods excel with High-Resource Languages (HRLs) but exhibit substantial limitations when applied to Low-Resource Languages (LRLs). This paper evaluates sentence-level hallucination detection approaches using Large Language Models (LLMs) and semantic similarity within massively multilingual embeddings. Our study spans 16 language directions, covering HRLs, LRLs, with diverse scripts. We find that the choice of model is essential for performance. On average, for HRLs, Llama3-70B outperforms the previous state of the art by as much as 0.16 MCC (Matthews Correlation Coefficient). However, for LRLs we observe that Claude Sonnet outperforms other LLMs on average by 0.03 MCC. The key takeaway from our study is that LLMs can achieve performance comparable or even better than previously proposed models, despite not being explicitly trained for any machine translation task. However, their advantage is less significant for LRLs.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Jul 2024.

Builds on

15 of 27 references.

References · 15

  1. 2023Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contextscited by 3,383
  2. 2022No Language Left Behind: Scaling Human-Centered Machine Translationcited by 1,290
  3. 2020Beyond English-Centric Multilingual Machine Translationcited by 559
  4. 2023Large Language Models Are State-of-the-Art Evaluators of Translation Qualitycited by 416
  5. 2023xCOMET: Transparent Machine Translation Evaluation through Fine-grained Error Detectioncited by 260
  6. 2023Better Zero-Shot Reasoning with Role-Play Promptingcited by 220
  7. 2023MADLAD-400: A Multilingual And Document-Level Large Audited Datasetcited by 180
  8. 2023SONAR: Sentence-Level Multimodal and Language-Agnostic Representationscited by 105
  9. 2023Enhancing Uncertainty-Based Hallucination Detection with Stronger Focuscited by 98
  10. 2023The Devil is in the Errors: Leveraging Large Language Models for Fine-grained Machine Translation Evaluationcited by 95
  11. 2023Are Large Language Model-based Evaluators the Solution to Scaling Up Multilingual Evaluation?cited by 87
  12. 2022Detecting and Mitigating Hallucinations in Machine Translation: Model Internal Workings Alone Do Well, Sentence Similarity Even Bettercited by 75
3 more
  1. 2023Understanding and Detecting Hallucinations in Neural Machine Translation via Model Introspectioncited by 44
  2. 2023HalOmi: A Manually Annotated Benchmark for Multilingual Hallucination and Omission Detection in Machine Translationcited by 35
  3. 2022SALTED: A Framework for SAlient Long-Tail Translation Error Detectioncited by 23

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 7; 2026: 3.

13 papers.

Sort:

By area: