mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

PhenoFlow: A Human-LLM Driven Visual Analytics System for Exploring Large and Complex Stroke Datasets

arXiv 2407.16329 ↗First posted 23 Jul 2024cs.HC cs.AIcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Acute stroke demands prompt diagnosis and treatment to achieve optimal patient outcomes. However, the intricate and irregular nature of clinical data associated with acute stroke, particularly blood pressure (BP) measurements, presents substantial obstacles to effective visual analytics and decision-making. Through a year-long collaboration with experienced neurologists, we developed PhenoFlow, a visual analytics system that leverages the collaboration between human and Large Language Models (LLMs) to analyze the extensive and complex data of acute ischemic stroke patients. PhenoFlow pioneers an innovative workflow, where the LLM serves as a data wrangler while neurologists explore and supervise the output using visualizations and natural language interactions. This approach enables neurologists to focus more on decision-making with reduced cognitive load. To protect sensitive patient information, PhenoFlow only utilizes metadata to make inferences and synthesize executable codes, without accessing raw patient data. This ensures that the results are both reproducible and interpretable while maintaining patient privacy. The system incorporates a slice-and-wrap design that employs temporal folding to create an overlaid circular visualization. Combined with a linear bar graph, this design aids in exploring meaningful patterns within irregularly measured BP data. Through case studies, PhenoFlow has demonstrated its capability to support iterative analysis of extensive clinical datasets, reducing cognitive load and enabling neurologists to make well-informed decisions. Grounded in long-term collaboration with domain experts, our research demonstrates the potential of utilizing LLMs to tackle current challenges in data-driven clinical decision-making for acute ischemic stroke patients.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Jul 2024.

Builds on

17 of 57 references.

References · 17

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  3. 2023Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learningcited by 4,276
  4. 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,189
  5. 2022Large Language Models Encode Clinical Knowledgecited by 1,830
  6. 2022Quantifying Memorization Across Neural Language Modelscited by 763
  7. 2023Towards Expert-Level Medical Question Answering with Large Language Modelscited by 384
  8. 2022Can Foundation Models Wrangle Your Data?cited by 175
  9. 2023A Survey of Large Language Models for Healthcare: from Data, Technology, and Applications to Accountability and Ethicscited by 163
  10. 2023Large AI Models in Health Informatics: Applications, Challenges, and the Futurecited by 61
  11. 2023Evaluating Large Language Models on a Highly-specialized Topic, Radiation Oncology Physicscited by 49
  12. 2023Can LLMs like GPT-4 outperform traditional AI tools in dementia diagnosis? Maybe, but not todaycited by 14
5 more
  1. 2020Survey on Visual Analysis of Event Sequence Datacited by 10
  2. 2023LeafAI: query generator for clinical cohort discovery rivaling a human programmercited by 9
  3. 2023Evaluation of AI Chatbots for Patient-Specific EHR Questionscited by 9
  4. 2019Tasks, Techniques, and Tools for Genomic Data Visualizationcited by 5
  5. 2020Comparative Layouts Revisited: Design Space, Guidelines, and Future Directionscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 4; 2026: 4.

9 papers.