Understanding Impacts of Electromagnetic Signal Injection Attacks on Object Detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Object detection can localize and identify objects in images, and it is extensively employed in critical multimedia applications such as security surveillance and autonomous driving. Despite the success of existing object detection models, they are often evaluated in ideal scenarios where captured images guarantee the accurate and complete representation of the detecting scenes. However, images captured by image sensors may be affected by different factors in real applications, including cyber-physical attacks. In particular, attackers can exploit hardware properties within the systems to inject electromagnetic interference so as to manipulate the images. Such attacks can cause noisy or incomplete information about the captured scene, leading to incorrect detection results, potentially granting attackers malicious control over critical functions of the systems. This paper presents a research work that comprehensively quantifies and analyzes the impacts of such attacks on state-of-the-art object detection models in practice. It also sheds light on the underlying reasons for the incorrect detection outcomes.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Jul 2024.
Builds on
14 of 35 references.
References · 14
- 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,639
- 2018BDD100K: A Diverse Driving Dataset for Heterogeneous Multitask Learningcited by 1,288
- 2019Object Detection in 20 Years: A Surveycited by 531
- 2022DETRs with Collaborative Hybrid Assignments Trainingcited by 274
- 2016COCO: A Platform for Comparing Continuous Optimizers in a Black-Box Settingcited by 138
- 2020Adversarial Camouflage: Hiding Physical-World Attacks with Natural Stylescited by 126
- 2020Invisible Perturbations: Physical Adversarial Examples Exploiting the Rolling Shutter Effectcited by 40
- 2023TPatch: A Triggered Physical Adversarial Patchcited by 22
- 2021They See Me Rollin': Inherent Vulnerability of the Rolling Shutter in CMOS Image Sensorscited by 17
- 2022Rolling Colors: Adversarial Laser Exploits against Traffic Light Recognitioncited by 15
- 2016COCO: Performance Assessmentcited by 8
- 2021Signal Injection Attacks against CCD Image Sensorscited by 6
2 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 4.
5 papers.
- 2025Safety of Embodied Navigation: A Surveycited by 10
- 2025Is Your Autonomous Vehicle Safe? Understanding the Threat of Electromagnetic Signal Injection Attacks on Traffic Scene Perceptioncited by 3
- 2024A Simulation Framework for Electromagnetic Signal Injection Attacks on Image Sensorscited by 2
- 2025Rainbow Artifacts from Electromagnetic Signal Injection Attacks on Image Sensorscited by 1
- 2025See No Evil: Adversarial Attacks Against Linguistic-Visual Association in Referring Multi-Object Tracking Systemscited by 1
- 2025See No Evil: Adversarial Attacks Against Linguistic-Visual Association in Referring Multi-Object Tracking Systems2 Sep 2025
- 2025Safety of Embodied Navigation: A Survey7 Aug 2025
- 2025Rainbow Artifacts from Electromagnetic Signal Injection Attacks on Image Sensors10 Jul 2025
- 2025Is Your Autonomous Vehicle Safe? Understanding the Threat of Electromagnetic Signal Injection Attacks on Traffic Scene Perception9 Jan 2025
- 2024A Simulation Framework for Electromagnetic Signal Injection Attacks on Image Sensors9 Aug 2024