A Community-Centric Perspective for Characterizing and Detecting Anti-Asian Violence-Provoking Speech
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Violence-provoking speech -- speech that implicitly or explicitly promotes violence against the members of the targeted community, contributed to a massive surge in anti-Asian crimes during the pandemic. While previous works have characterized and built tools for detecting other forms of harmful speech, like fear speech and hate speech, our work takes a community-centric approach to studying anti-Asian violence-provoking speech. Using data from ~420k Twitter posts spanning a 3-year duration (January 1, 2020 to February 1, 2023), we develop a codebook to characterize anti-Asian violence-provoking speech and collect a community-crowdsourced dataset to facilitate its large-scale detection using state-of-the-art classifiers. We contrast the capabilities of natural language processing classifiers, ranging from BERT-based to LLM-based classifiers, in detecting violence-provoking speech with their capabilities to detect anti-Asian hateful speech. In contrast to prior work that has demonstrated the effectiveness of such classifiers in detecting hateful speech (F1 = 0.89), our work shows that accurate and reliable detection of violence-provoking speech is a challenging task (F1 = 0.69). We discuss the implications of our findings, particularly the need for proactive interventions to support Asian communities during public health crises. The resources related to the study are available at https://claws-lab.github.io/violence-provoking-speech/.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jul 2024.
Builds on
14 of 40 references.
References · 14
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
- 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,375
- 2019DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lightercited by 4,307
- 2022Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Modelscited by 3,024
- 2020DeBERTa: Decoding-enhanced BERT with Disentangled Attentioncited by 2,181
- 2020Exploiting Cloze Questions for Few Shot Text Classification and Natural Language Inferencecited by 938
- 2021Latent Hatred: A Benchmark for Understanding Implicit Hate Speechcited by 217
- 2020Racism is a Virus: Anti-Asian Hate and Counterspeech in Social Media during the COVID-19 Crisiscited by 40
- 2021A Framework of Severity for Harmful Content Onlinecited by 23
- 2021"Short is the Road that Leads from Fear to Hate": Fear Speech in Indian WhatsApp Groupscited by 13
- 2023Towards Agile Text Classifiers for Everyonecited by 13
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 1.
4 papers.
- 2025CountQA: How Well Do MLLMs Count in the Wild?cited by 19
- 2025The Artificial Intelligence Cognitive Examination: A Survey on the Evolution of Multimodal Evaluation from Recognition to Reasoningcited by 4
- 2026The Consensus Trap: Dissecting Subjectivity and the "Ground Truth" Illusion in Data Annotationcited by 2
- 2025The Influence of Text Variation on User Engagement in Cross-Platform Content Sharingcited by 0
- 2026The Consensus Trap: Dissecting Subjectivity and the "Ground Truth" Illusion in Data Annotation11 Feb 2026
- 2025The Artificial Intelligence Cognitive Examination: A Survey on the Evolution of Multimodal Evaluation from Recognition to Reasoning5 Oct 2025
- 2025CountQA: How Well Do MLLMs Count in the Wild?8 Aug 2025
- 2025The Influence of Text Variation on User Engagement in Cross-Platform Content Sharing26 Apr 2025