Towards Automated Functional Equation Proving: A Benchmark Dataset and A Domain-Specific In-Context Agent
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Educational agents and math problem solving
Abstract (arXiv)
Automated Theorem Proving (ATP) faces challenges due to its complexity and computational demands. Recent work has explored using Large Language Models (LLMs) for ATP action selection, but these methods can be resource-intensive. This study introduces FEAS, an agent that enhances the COPRA in-context learning framework within Lean. FEAS refines prompt generation, response parsing, and incorporates domain-specific heuristics for functional equations. It introduces FunEq, a curated dataset of functional equation problems with varying difficulty. FEAS outperforms baselines on FunEq, particularly with the integration of domain-specific heuristics. The results demonstrate FEAS's effectiveness in generating and formalizing high-level proof strategies into Lean proofs, showcasing the potential of tailored approaches for specific ATP challenges.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Educational agents and math problem solving, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 13 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Jul 2024.
Builds on
13 of 25 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 12
- 2023LeanDojo: Theorem Proving with Retrieval-Augmented Language Modelscited by 414
- 2023Llemma: An Open Language Model For Mathematicscited by 385
- 2021MiniF2F: a cross-system benchmark for formal Olympiad-level mathematicscited by 380
- 2020Generative Language Modeling for Automated Theorem Provingcited by 379
- 2022Autoformalization with Large Language Modelscited by 252
- 2022HyperTree Proof Search for Neural Theorem Provingcited by 192
- 2022Formal Mathematics Statement Curriculum Learningcited by 141
- 2021Proof Artifact Co-training for Theorem Proving with Language Modelscited by 130
- 2019Learning to Prove Theorems via Interacting with Proof Assistantscited by 107
- 2018TacticToe: Learning to Prove with Tacticscited by 43
- 2021TacticZero: Learning to Prove Theorems from Scratch with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 37
- 2020The Tactician (extended version): A Seamless, Interactive Tactic Learner and Prover for Coqcited by 23
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026LEAP: Supercharging LLMs for Formal Mathematics with Agentic Frameworks
- 2024ImProver: Agent-Based Automated Proof Optimization
- 2026Advancing Mathematics Research with AI-Driven Formal Proof Search
- 2025BFS-Prover: Scalable Best-First Tree Search for LLM-based Automatic Theorem Proving
- 2025LeanConjecturer: Automatic Generation of Mathematical Conjectures for Theorem Proving
- 2026TaoBench: Do Automated Theorem Prover LLMs Generalize Beyond MathLib?
- 2026MechMath: Sorrifier-Driven Formal Decomposition Workflow for Automated Theorem Proving
- 2025ProofBridge: Auto-Formalization of Natural Language Proofs in Lean via Joint Embeddings