The Sticky Path to Expressive Querying: Decidability of Navigational Queries under Existential Rules
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Extensive research in the field of ontology-based query answering has led to the identification of numerous fragments of existential rules (also known as tuple-generating dependencies) that exhibit decidable answering of atomic and conjunctive queries. Motivated by the increased theoretical and practical interest in navigational queries, this paper considers the question for which of these fragments decidability of querying extends to regular path queries (RPQs). In fact, decidability of RPQs has recently been shown to generally hold for the comprehensive family of all fragments that come with the guarantee of universal models being reasonably well-shaped (that is, being of finite cliquewidth). Yet, for the second major family of fragments, known as finite unification sets (short: fus), which are based on first-order-rewritability, corresponding results have been largely elusive so far. We complete the picture by showing that RPQ answering over arbitrary fus rulesets is undecidable. On the positive side, we establish that the problem is decidable for the prominent fus subclass of sticky rulesets, with the caveat that a very mild extension of the RPQ formalism turns the problem undecidable again.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Jul 2024.
Builds on
4 of 23 references.
References · 4
- 2014Acyclicity Notions for Existential Rules and Their Application to Query Answering in Ontologiescited by 10
- 2013Sound, Complete and Minimal UCQ-Rewriting for Existential Rulescited by 8
- 2022Finite-Cliquewidth Sets of Existential Rules: Toward a General Criterion for Decidable yet Highly Expressive Queryingcited by 4
- 2020A Journey to the Frontiers of Query Rewritabilitycited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.