Straightforward Layer-wise Pruning for More Efficient Visual Adaptation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Parameter-efficient transfer learning (PETL) aims to adapt large pre-trained models using limited parameters. While most PETL approaches update the added parameters and freeze pre-trained weights during training, the minimal impact of task-specific deep layers on cross-domain data poses a challenge as PETL cannot modify them, resulting in redundant model structures. Structural pruning effectively reduces model redundancy; however, common pruning methods often lead to an excessive increase in stored parameters due to varying pruning structures based on pruning rates and data. Recognizing the storage parameter volume issue, we propose a Straightforward layer-wise pruning method, called SLS, for pruning PETL-transferred models. By evaluating parameters from a feature perspective of each layer and utilizing clustering metrics to assess current parameters based on clustering phenomena in low-dimensional space obtained through t-SNE, SLS facilitates informed pruning decisions. Our study reveals that layer-wise pruning, with a focus on storing pruning indices, addresses storage volume concerns. Notably, mainstream Layer-wise pruning methods may not be suitable for assessing layer importance in PETL-transferred models, where the majority of parameters are pre-trained and have limited relevance to downstream datasets. Comparative analysis against state-of-the-art PETL methods demonstrates that the pruned model achieved a notable balance between model throughput and accuracy. Moreover, SLS effectively reduces storage overhead arising from varying pruned structures while enhancing the accuracy and speed of pruned models compared to conventional pruning methods.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 35 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Jul 2024.
Builds on
35 of 50 references.
References · 35
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
- 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,139
- 2019Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLPcited by 4,236
- 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,915
- 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,795
- 2015Deep Compression: Compressing Deep Neural Networks with Pruning, Trained Quantization and Huffman Codingcited by 2,329
- 2021Pre-train, Prompt, and Predict: A Systematic Survey of Prompting Methods in Natural Language Processingcited by 2,234
- 2022Visual Prompt Tuningcited by 1,681
- 2020Rethinking Semantic Segmentation from a Sequence-to-Sequence Perspective with Transformerscited by 1,369
- 2014How transferable are features in deep neural networks?cited by 1,225
23 more
- 2016Pruning Filters for Efficient ConvNetscited by 1,143
- 2016Semantic Understanding of Scenes through the ADE20K Datasetcited by 1,069
- 2022AdaptFormer: Adapting Vision Transformers for Scalable Visual Recognitioncited by 719
- 2019A Large-scale Study of Representation Learning with the Visual Task Adaptation Benchmarkcited by 425
- 2018Filter Pruning via Geometric Median for Deep Convolutional Neural Networks Accelerationcited by 367
- 2022Scaling & Shifting Your Features: A New Baseline for Efficient Model Tuningcited by 294
- 2021Factual Probing Is [MASK]: Learning vs. Learning to Recallcited by 291
- 2017Convolutional Neural Networks for Medical Image Analysis: Full Training or Fine Tuning?cited by 221
- 2023DepGraph: Towards Any Structural Pruningcited by 203
- 2023Scaling Down to Scale Up: A Guide to Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuningcited by 173
- 2023Continual Diffusion: Continual Customization of Text-to-Image Diffusion with C-LoRAcited by 141
- 2021Group Fisher Pruning for Practical Network Compressioncited by 131
- 2020Layer-adaptive sparsity for the Magnitude-based Pruningcited by 126
- 2022Convolutional Bypasses Are Better Vision Transformer Adapterscited by 121
- 2018Rethinking the Smaller-Norm-Less-Informative Assumption in Channel Pruning of Convolution Layerscited by 112
- 2023Towards Efficient Visual Adaption via Structural Re-parameterizationcited by 73
- 2022Vision Transformer Slimming: Multi-Dimension Searching in Continuous Optimization Spacecited by 66
- 2022Pro-tuning: Unified Prompt Tuning for Vision Taskscited by 53
- 2019Neural Network Pruning with Residual-Connections and Limited-Datacited by 52
- 2021Hessian-Aware Pruning and Optimal Neural Implantcited by 45
- 2020A Gradient Flow Framework For Analyzing Network Pruningcited by 36
- 2021Network Pruning That Matters: A Case Study on Retraining Variantscited by 25
- 2020To Filter Prune, or to Layer Prune, That Is The Questioncited by 23
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.