mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Latent Causal Probing: A Formal Perspective on Probing with Causal Models of Data

arXiv 2407.13765 ↗First posted 18 Jul 2024cs.CL cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As language models (LMs) deliver increasing performance on a range of NLP tasks, probing classifiers have become an indispensable technique in the effort to better understand their inner workings. A typical setup involves (1) defining an auxiliary task consisting of a dataset of text annotated with labels, then (2) supervising small classifiers to predict the labels from the representations of a pretrained LM as it processed the dataset. A high probing accuracy is interpreted as evidence that the LM has learned to perform the auxiliary task as an unsupervised byproduct of its original pretraining objective. Despite the widespread usage of probes, however, the robust design and analysis of probing experiments remains a challenge. We develop a formal perspective on probing using structural causal models (SCM). Specifically, given an SCM which explains the distribution of tokens observed during training, we frame the central hypothesis as whether the LM has learned to represent the latent variables of the SCM. Empirically, we extend a recent study of LMs in the context of a synthetic grid-world navigation task, where having an exact model of the underlying causal structure allows us to draw strong inferences from the result of probing experiments. Our techniques provide robust empirical evidence for the ability of LMs to induce the latent concepts underlying text.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Jul 2024.

Builds on

30 of 47 references.

References · 30

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  3. 2022Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTcited by 2,691
  4. 2016Understanding intermediate layers using linear classifier probescited by 1,353
  5. 2022CodeGen: An Open Large Language Model for Code with Multi-Turn Program Synthesiscited by 885
  6. 2021Probing Classifiers: Promises, Shortcomings, and Advancescited by 876
  7. 2019Designing and Interpreting Probes with Control Taskscited by 640
  8. 2019Learning the Difference that Makes a Difference with Counterfactually-Augmented Datacited by 439
  9. 2022Emergent World Representations: Exploring a Sequence Model Trained on a Synthetic Taskcited by 431
  10. 2021Causal Abstractions of Neural Networkscited by 422
  11. 2018Analysis Methods in Neural Language Processing: A Surveycited by 277
  12. 2023Reasoning or Reciting? Exploring the Capabilities and Limitations of Language Models Through Counterfactual Taskscited by 246
18 more
  1. 2020Information-Theoretic Probing with Minimum Description Lengthcited by 232
  2. 2016Fine-grained Analysis of Sentence Embeddings Using Auxiliary Prediction Taskscited by 216
  3. 2020Information-Theoretic Probing for Linguistic Structurecited by 207
  4. 2021Implicit Representations of Meaning in Neural Language Modelscited by 180
  5. 2021Causal Inference in Natural Language Processing: Estimation, Prediction, Interpretation and Beyondcited by 178
  6. 2023Causal Parrots: Large Language Models May Talk Causality But Are Not Causalcited by 150
  7. 2022Language Models as Agent Modelscited by 132
  8. 2021Can Language Models Encode Perceptual Structure Without Grounding? A Case Study in Colorcited by 119
  9. 2022Measuring Causal Effects of Data Statistics on Language Model's `Factual' Predictionscited by 57
  10. 2022CEBaB: Estimating the Causal Effects of Real-World Concepts on NLP Model Behaviorcited by 55
  11. 2023Understanding Causality with Large Language Models: Feasibility and Opportunitiescited by 53
  12. 2020A Tale of a Probe and a Parsercited by 40
  13. 2023Emergent Representations of Program Semantics in Language Models Trained on Programscited by 30
  14. 2021A Bayesian Framework for Information-Theoretic Probingcited by 22
  15. 2020An information theoretic view on selecting linguistic probescited by 19
  16. 2022Naturalistic Causal Probing for Morpho-Syntaxcited by 19
  17. 2021Probing as Quantifying Inductive Biascited by 12
  18. 2020BERTering RAMS: What and How Much does BERT Already Know About Event Arguments? -- A Study on the RAMS Datasetcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.

1 paper.