mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Conformal Performance Range Prediction for Segmentation Output Quality Control

arXiv 2407.13307 ↗First posted 18 Jul 2024eess.IV cs.CVcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent works have introduced methods to estimate segmentation performance without ground truth, relying solely on neural network softmax outputs. These techniques hold potential for intuitive output quality control. However, such performance estimates rely on calibrated softmax outputs, which is often not the case in modern neural networks. Moreover, the estimates do not take into account inherent uncertainty in segmentation tasks. These limitations may render precise performance predictions unattainable, restricting the practical applicability of performance estimation methods. To address these challenges, we develop a novel approach for predicting performance ranges with statistical guarantees of containing the ground truth with a user specified probability. Our method leverages sampling-based segmentation uncertainty estimation to derive heuristic performance ranges, and applies split conformal prediction to transform these estimates into rigorous prediction ranges that meet the desired guarantees. We demonstrate our approach on the FIVES retinal vessel segmentation dataset and compare five commonly used sampling-based uncertainty estimation techniques. Our results show that it is possible to achieve the desired coverage with small prediction ranges, highlighting the potential of performance range prediction as a valuable tool for output quality control.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Jul 2024.

Builds on

16 of 34 references.

References · 16

  1. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
  2. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
  3. 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,888
  4. 2021A Gentle Introduction to Conformal Prediction and Distribution-Free Uncertainty Quantificationcited by 777
  5. 2022Conformal prediction beyond exchangeabilitycited by 348
  6. 2018A Probabilistic U-Net for Segmentation of Ambiguous Imagescited by 281
  7. 2022Medical Image Segmentation Review: The success of U-Netcited by 190
  8. 2019PHiSeg: Capturing Uncertainty in Medical Image Segmentationcited by 128
  9. 2022Image-to-Image Regression with Distribution-Free Uncertainty Quantification and Applications in Imagingcited by 107
  10. 2022Residual Pattern Learning for Pixel-wise Out-of-Distribution Detection in Semantic Segmentationcited by 55
  11. 2017Reverse Classification Accuracy: Predicting Segmentation Performance in the Absence of Ground Truthcited by 35
  12. 2024ValUES: A Framework for Systematic Validation of Uncertainty Estimation in Semantic Segmentationcited by 25
4 more
  1. 2018Real-time Prediction of Segmentation Qualitycited by 23
  2. 2022Estimating Model Performance under Domain Shifts with Class-Specific Confidence Scorescited by 10
  3. 2020Automated quantification of myocardial tissue characteristics from native T1 mapping using neural networks with Bayesian inference for uncertainty-based quality-controlcited by 6
  4. 2021Automatic quality control framework for more reliable integration of machine learning-based image segmentation into medical workflowscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 5; 2026: 1.

8 papers.