Mixture of Experts based Multi-task Supervise Learning from Crowds
On the map: Mixture-of-experts → MoE theory and gating functions
Abstract (arXiv)
Existing truth inference methods in crowdsourcing aim to map redundant labels and items to the ground truth. They treat the ground truth as hidden variables and use statistical or deep learning-based worker behavior models to infer the ground truth. However, worker behavior models that rely on ground truth hidden variables overlook workers' behavior at the item feature level, leading to imprecise characterizations and negatively impacting the quality of truth inference. This paper proposes a new paradigm of multi-task supervised learning from crowds, which eliminates the need for modeling of items's ground truth in worker behavior models. Within this paradigm, we propose a worker behavior model at the item feature level called Mixture of Experts based Multi-task Supervised Learning from Crowds (MMLC). Two truth inference strategies are proposed within MMLC. The first strategy, named MMLC-owf, utilizes clustering methods in the worker spectral space to identify the projection vector of the oracle worker. Subsequently, the labels generated based on this vector are considered as the inferred truth. The second strategy, called MMLC-df, employs the MMLC model to fill the crowdsourced data, which can enhance the effectiveness of existing truth inference methods. Experimental results demonstrate that MMLC-owf outperforms state-of-the-art methods and MMLC-df enhances the quality of existing truth inference methods.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in MoE theory and gating functions, one of 12 directions in Mixture-of-experts. Builds on 12 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Jul 2024.
Builds on
12 of 31 references.
References · 12
- 2019Learning From Noisy Labels By Regularized Estimation Of Annotator Confusioncited by 126
- 2017Deep learning from crowdscited by 105
- 2020Learning from Crowds by Modeling Common Confusionscited by 32
- 2019Max-MIG: an Information Theoretic Approach for Joint Learning from Crowdscited by 26
- 2014Error Rate Bounds and Iterative Weighted Majority Voting for Crowdsourcingcited by 20
- 2018Fast Dawid-Skene: A Fast Vote Aggregation Scheme for Sentiment Classificationcited by 12
- 2023Deep Learning From Crowdsourced Labels: Coupled Cross-entropy Minimization, Identifiability, and Regularizationcited by 12
- 2022Learning from Multiple Annotator Noisy Labels via Sample-wise Label Fusioncited by 10
- 2018Analysis of Minimax Error Rate for Crowdsourcing and Its Application to Worker Clustering Modelcited by 6
- 2018Crowdsourcing Semantic Label Propagation in Relation Classificationcited by 6
- 2021Improve Learning from Crowds via Generative Augmentationcited by 6
- 2023Crowdsourcing Utilizing Subgroup Structure of Latent Factor Modelingcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Learning From Crowdsourced Noisy Labels: A Signal Processing Perspective
- 2026Diverse by Reasoning: Harnessing the Wisdom of LLM Crowds for Future Prediction
- 2022Task-Specific Expert Pruning for Sparse Mixture-of-Experts
- 2024TemPrompt: Multi-Task Prompt Learning for Temporal Relation Extraction in RAG-based Crowdsourcing Systems
- 2023Revisiting Single-gated Mixtures of Experts
- 2026Multi-View Trust Evaluation for Collaborator Selection via Evidential Deep Learning
- 2025Crowd Comparative Reasoning: Unlocking Comprehensive Evaluations for LLM-as-a-Judge
- 2026Truthful Online Preference Aggregation for LLM Fine-Tuning in Mobile Crowdsourcing