mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Improved Esophageal Varices Assessment from Non-Contrast CT Scans

arXiv 2407.13210 ↗First posted 18 Jul 2024eess.IV cs.CVcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Esophageal varices (EV), a serious health concern resulting from portal hypertension, are traditionally diagnosed through invasive endoscopic procedures. Despite non-contrast computed tomography (NC-CT) imaging being a less expensive and non-invasive imaging modality, it has yet to gain full acceptance as a primary clinical diagnostic tool for EV evaluation. To overcome existing diagnostic challenges, we present the Multi-Organ-cOhesion-Network (MOON), a novel framework enhancing the analysis of critical organ features in NC-CT scans for effective assessment of EV. Drawing inspiration from the thorough assessment practices of radiologists, MOON establishes a cohesive multiorgan analysis model that unifies the imaging features of the related organs of EV, namely esophagus, liver, and spleen. This integration significantly increases the diagnostic accuracy for EV. We have compiled an extensive NC-CT dataset of 1,255 patients diagnosed with EV, spanning three grades of severity. Each case is corroborated by endoscopic diagnostic results. The efficacy of MOON has been substantiated through a validation process involving multi-fold cross-validation on 1,010 cases and an independent test on 245 cases, exhibiting superior diagnostic performance compared to methods focusing solely on the esophagus (for classifying severe grade: AUC of 0.864 versus 0.803, and for moderate to severe grades: AUC of 0.832 versus 0.793). To our knowledge, MOON is the first work to incorporate a synchronized multi-organ NC-CT analysis for EV assessment, providing a more acceptable and minimally invasive alternative for patients compared to traditional endoscopy.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Jul 2024.

Builds on

13 of 27 references.

References · 13

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  4. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
  5. 2016Feature Pyramid Networks for Object Detectioncited by 5,036
  6. 2017FiLM: Visual Reasoning with a General Conditioning Layercited by 2,333
  7. 2017A Closer Look at Spatiotemporal Convolutions for Action Recognitioncited by 1,143
  8. 2014Two-Stream Convolutional Networks for Action Recognition in Videoscited by 1,068
  9. 2019EfficientDet: Scalable and Efficient Object Detectioncited by 1,020
  10. 2016Convolutional Two-Stream Network Fusion for Video Action Recognitioncited by 384
  11. 2018A Short Note about Kinetics-600cited by 333
  12. 2018Efficient Low-rank Multimodal Fusion with Modality-Specific Factorscited by 270
1 more
  1. 2022UniFormer: Unifying Convolution and Self-attention for Visual Recognitioncited by 206

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2.

3 papers.