Visions of a Discipline: Analyzing Introductory AI Courses on YouTube
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Education plays an indispensable role in fostering societal well-being and is widely regarded as one of the most influential factors in shaping the future of generations to come. As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes more deeply integrated into our daily lives and the workforce, educational institutions at all levels are directing their focus on resources that cater to AI education. Our work investigates the current landscape of introductory AI courses on YouTube, and the potential for introducing ethics in this context. We qualitatively analyze the 20 most watched introductory AI courses on YouTube, coding a total of 92.2 hours of educational content viewed by close to 50 million people. Introductory AI courses do not meaningfully engage with ethical or societal challenges of AI (RQ1). When textitdefining and framing AI, introductory AI courses foreground excitement around AI's transformative role in society, over-exaggerate AI's current and future abilities, and anthropomorphize AI (RQ2). In textitteaching AI, we see a widespread reliance on corporate AI tools and frameworks as well as a prioritization on a hands-on approach to learning rather than on conceptual foundations (RQ3). In promoting key textitAI practices, introductory AI courses abstract away entirely the socio-technical nature of AI classification and prediction, for example by favoring data quantity over data quality (RQ4). We extend our analysis with recommendations that aim to integrate ethical reflections into introductory AI courses. We recommend that introductory AI courses should (1) highlight ethical challenges of AI to present a more balanced perspective, (2) raise ethical issues explicitly relevant to the technical concepts discussed and (3) nurture a sense of accountability in future AI developers.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 31 May 2024.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 3.
3 papers.
- 2025Privacy of Groups in Dense Street Imagerycited by 1
- 2025"I Hadn't Thought About That": Creators of Human-like AI Weigh in on Ethics And Neurodivergencecited by 1
- 2025Wayfinding through the AI wilderness: Mapping rhetorics of ChatGPT prompt writing on X (formerly Twitter) to promote critical AI literaciescited by 0
- 2025Wayfinding through the AI wilderness: Mapping rhetorics of ChatGPT prompt writing on X (formerly Twitter) to promote critical AI literacies30 Oct 2025
- 2025"I Hadn't Thought About That": Creators of Human-like AI Weigh in on Ethics And Neurodivergence12 Jun 2025
- 2025Privacy of Groups in Dense Street Imagery11 May 2025