Large Language Models can impersonate politicians and other public figures
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Modern AI technology like Large language models (LLMs) has the potential to pollute the public information sphere with made-up content, which poses a significant threat to the cohesion of societies at large. A wide range of research has shown that LLMs are capable of generating text of impressive quality, including persuasive political speech, text with a pre-defined style, and role-specific content. But there is a crucial gap in the literature: We lack large-scale and systematic studies of how capable LLMs are in impersonating political and societal representatives and how the general public judges these impersonations in terms of authenticity, relevance and coherence. We present the results of a study based on a cross-section of British society that shows that LLMs are able to generate responses to debate questions that were part of a broadcast political debate programme in the UK. The impersonated responses are judged to be more authentic and relevant than the original responses given by people who were impersonated. This shows two things: (1) LLMs can be made to contribute meaningfully to the public political debate and (2) there is a dire need to inform the general public of the potential harm this can have on society.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Jul 2024.
Builds on
5 of 34 references.
References · 5
- 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,100
- 2023How Close is ChatGPT to Human Experts? Comparison Corpus, Evaluation, and Detectioncited by 481
- 2023In-Context Impersonation Reveals Large Language Models' Strengths and Biasescited by 155
- 2022Moral Mimicry: Large Language Models Produce Moral Rationalizations Tailored to Political Identitycited by 74
- 2024Exploring the Deceptive Power of LLM-Generated Fake News: A Study of Real-World Detection Challengescited by 30
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 1.
5 papers.
- 2025Catch Me If You Can? Not Yet: LLMs Still Struggle to Imitate the Implicit Writing Styles of Everyday Authorscited by 10
- 2025When Personalization Tricks Detectors: The Feature-Inversion Trap in Machine-Generated Text Detectioncited by 1
- 2025ParliaBench: An Evaluation and Benchmarking Framework for LLM-Generated Parliamentary Speechcited by 1
- 2025Persona-driven Simulation of Voting Behavior in the European Parliament with Large Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026Authorship Impersonation via LLM Prompting does not Evade Authorship Verification Methodscited by 0
- 2026Authorship Impersonation via LLM Prompting does not Evade Authorship Verification Methods31 Mar 2026
- 2025ParliaBench: An Evaluation and Benchmarking Framework for LLM-Generated Parliamentary Speech11 Nov 2025
- 2025When Personalization Tricks Detectors: The Feature-Inversion Trap in Machine-Generated Text Detection14 Oct 2025
- 2025Catch Me If You Can? Not Yet: LLMs Still Struggle to Imitate the Implicit Writing Styles of Everyday Authors18 Sep 2025
- 2025Persona-driven Simulation of Voting Behavior in the European Parliament with Large Language Models13 Jun 2025