Calibrated Diverse Ensemble Entropy Minimization for Robust Test-Time Adaptation in Prostate Cancer Detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
High resolution micro-ultrasound has demonstrated promise in real-time prostate cancer detection, with deep learning becoming a prominent tool for learning complex tissue properties reflected on ultrasound. However, a significant roadblock to real-world deployment remains, which prior works often overlook: model performance suffers when applied to data from different clinical centers due to variations in data distribution. This distribution shift significantly impacts the model's robustness, posing major challenge to clinical deployment. Domain adaptation and specifically its test-time adaption (TTA) variant offer a promising solution to address this challenge. In a setting designed to reflect real-world conditions, we compare existing methods to state-of-the-art TTA approaches adopted for cancer detection, demonstrating the lack of robustness to distribution shifts in the former. We then propose Diverse Ensemble Entropy Minimization (DEnEM), questioning the effectiveness of current TTA methods on ultrasound data. We show that these methods, although outperforming baselines, are suboptimal due to relying on neural networks output probabilities, which could be uncalibrated, or relying on data augmentation, which is not straightforward to define on ultrasound data. Our results show a significant improvement of 5% to 7% in AUROC over the existing methods and 3% to 5% over TTA methods, demonstrating the advantage of DEnEM in addressing distribution shift. keywordsUltrasound Imaging and Prostate Cancer and Computer-aided Diagnosis and Distribution Shift Robustness and Test-time Adaptation.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Jul 2024.
Builds on
21 of 32 references.
References · 21
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 6,979
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
- 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,712
- 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,888
- 2018Group Normalizationcited by 1,514
- 2020WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shiftscited by 1,366
- 2019Can You Trust Your Model's Uncertainty? Evaluating Predictive Uncertainty Under Dataset Shiftcited by 1,274
- 2019Distributionally Robust Neural Networks for Group Shifts: On the Importance of Regularization for Worst-Case Generalizationcited by 1,232
- 2023Towards Stable Test-Time Adaptation in Dynamic Wild Worldcited by 409
- 2022Last Layer Re-Training is Sufficient for Robustness to Spurious Correlationscited by 379
9 more
- 2021MEMO: Test Time Robustness via Adaptation and Augmentationcited by 376
- 2023A Comprehensive Survey on Test-Time Adaptation under Distribution Shiftscited by 353
- 2019A review of domain adaptation without target labelscited by 154
- 2022Test-Time Adaptation via Conjugate Pseudo-labelscited by 98
- 2021MT3: Meta Test-Time Training for Self-Supervised Test-Time Adaptioncited by 65
- 2023On Pitfalls of Test-Time Adaptationcited by 63
- 2022Towards Confident Detection of Prostate Cancer using High Resolution Micro-ultrasoundcited by 9
- 2023TRUSformer: Improving Prostate Cancer Detection from Micro-Ultrasound Using Attention and Self-Supervisioncited by 8
- 2022Self-Supervised Learning with Limited Labeled Data for Prostate Cancer Detection in High Frequency Ultrasoundcited by 7
Built on by
Not cited yet.