mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Geometric and computational hardness of bilevel programming

arXiv 2407.12372 ↗First posted 17 Jul 2024cs.CC math.OCcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We first show a simple but striking result in bilevel optimization: unconstrained C^∞ smooth bilevel programming is as hard as general extended-real-valued lower semicontinuous minimization. We then proceed to a worst-case analysis of box-constrained bilevel polynomial optimization. We show in particular that any extended-real-valued semi-algebraic function, possibly non-continuous, can be expressed as the value function of a polynomial bilevel program. Secondly, from a computational complexity perspective, the decision version of polynomial bilevel programming is one level above NP in the polynomial hierarchy (Sigmap2-hard). Both types of difficulties are uncommon in non-linear programs for which objective functions are typically continuous and belong to the class NP. These results highlight the irremediable hardness attached to general bilevel optimization and the necessity of imposing some form of regularity on the lower level.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 17 Jul 2024.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

4 papers.