Geometric and computational hardness of bilevel programming
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We first show a simple but striking result in bilevel optimization: unconstrained C^∞ smooth bilevel programming is as hard as general extended-real-valued lower semicontinuous minimization. We then proceed to a worst-case analysis of box-constrained bilevel polynomial optimization. We show in particular that any extended-real-valued semi-algebraic function, possibly non-continuous, can be expressed as the value function of a polynomial bilevel program. Secondly, from a computational complexity perspective, the decision version of polynomial bilevel programming is one level above NP in the polynomial hierarchy (Sigmap2-hard). Both types of difficulties are uncommon in non-linear programs for which objective functions are typically continuous and belong to the class NP. These results highlight the irremediable hardness attached to general bilevel optimization and the necessity of imposing some form of regularity on the lower level.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 17 Jul 2024.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
4 papers.
- 2025Optimizing Pre-Training Data Mixtures with Mixtures of Data Expert Modelscited by 5
- 2024Differentially Private Bilevel Optimizationcited by 2
- 2025Learning Theory for Kernel Bilevel Optimizationcited by 2
- 2026Prediction-Intervention Games and Invariant Setscited by 0
- 2026Prediction-Intervention Games and Invariant Sets16 May 2026
- 2025Optimizing Pre-Training Data Mixtures with Mixtures of Data Expert Models21 Feb 2025
- 2025Learning Theory for Kernel Bilevel Optimization12 Feb 2025
- 2024Differentially Private Bilevel Optimization29 Sep 2024