mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

An investigation into the scientific landscape of the conversational and generative artificial intelligence, and human-chatbot interaction in education and research

arXiv 2407.12004 ↗First posted 15 Jun 2024cs.CY cs.AI cs.HCcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Artificial intelligence (AI) as a disruptive technology is not new. However, its recent evolution, engineered by technological transformation, big data analytics, and quantum computing, produces conversational and generative AI (CGAI/GenAI) and human-like chatbots that disrupt conventional operations and methods in different fields. This study investigates the scientific landscape of CGAI and human-chatbot interaction/collaboration and evaluates use cases, benefits, challenges, and policy implications for multidisciplinary education and allied industry operations. The publications trend showed that just 4% (n=75) occurred during 2006-2018, while 2019-2023 experienced astronomical growth (n=1763 or 96%). The prominent use cases of CGAI (e.g., ChatGPT) for teaching, learning, and research activities occurred in computer science [multidisciplinary and AI] (32%), medical/healthcare (17%), engineering (7%), and business fields (6%). The intellectual structure shows strong collaboration among eminent multidisciplinary sources in business, Information Systems, and other areas. The thematic structure of SLP highlights prominent CGAI use cases, including improved user experience in human-computer interaction, computer programs/code generation, and systems creation. Widespread CGAI usefulness for teachers, researchers, and learners includes syllabi/course content generation, testing aids, and academic writing. The concerns about abuse and misuse (plagiarism, academic integrity, privacy violations) and issues about misinformation, danger of self-diagnoses, and patient privacy in medical/healthcare applications are prominent. Formulating strategies and policies to address potential CGAI challenges in teaching/learning and practice are priorities. Developing discipline-based automatic detection of GenAI contents to check abuse is proposed.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 78 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Jun 2024.

Builds on

6 of 78 references.

References · 6

  1. 2020A Review on Generative Adversarial Networks: Algorithms, Theory, and Applicationscited by 209
  2. 2023ChatGPT: Jack of all trades, master of nonecited by 204
  3. 2023ChatGPT and a New Academic Reality: Artificial Intelligence-Written Research Papers and the Ethics of the Large Language Models in Scholarly Publishingcited by 51
  4. 2023New Era of Artificial Intelligence in Education: Towards a Sustainable Multifaceted Revolutioncited by 20
  5. 2023Many bioinformatics programming tasks can be automated with ChatGPTcited by 11
  6. 2021eXtended Artificial Intelligence: New Prospects of Human-AI Interaction Researchcited by 6

Built on by

Not cited yet.