mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Adversarial Robustness of Graph Transformers

arXiv 2407.11764 ↗First posted 16 Jul 2024cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Existing studies have shown that Message-Passing Graph Neural Networks (MPNNs) are highly susceptible to adversarial attacks. In contrast, despite the increasing importance of Graph Transformers (GTs), their robustness properties are unexplored. We close this gap and design the first adaptive attacks for GTs. In particular, we provide general design principles for strong gradient-based attacks on GTs w.r.t. structure perturbations and instantiate our attack framework for five representative and popular GT architectures. Specifically, we study GTs with specialized attention mechanisms and Positional Encodings (PEs) based on pairwise shortest paths, random walks, and the Laplacian spectrum. We evaluate our attacks on multiple tasks and perturbation models, including structure perturbations for node and graph classification, and node injection for graph classification. Our results reveal that GTs can be catastrophically fragile in many cases. Addressing this vulnerability, we show how our adaptive attacks can be effectively used for adversarial training, substantially improving robustness.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Jul 2024.

Builds on

32 of 43 references.

References · 32

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,282
  3. 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,854
  4. 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
  5. 2017Deep Setscited by 1,394
  6. 2018Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of Security: Circumventing Defenses to Adversarial Examplescited by 1,259
  7. 2021How Attentive are Graph Attention Networks?cited by 818
  8. 2022Recipe for a General, Powerful, Scalable Graph Transformercited by 702
  9. 2020Benchmarking Graph Neural Networkscited by 672
  10. 2019Adversarial Training for Free!cited by 638
  11. 2020On Adaptive Attacks to Adversarial Example Defensescited by 547
  12. 2021Rethinking Graph Transformers with Spectral Attentioncited by 468
20 more
  1. 2018Adversarial Attacks on Neural Networks for Graph Datacited by 395
  2. 2017Residual Gated Graph ConvNetscited by 341
  3. 2021Do Transformers Really Perform Bad for Graph Representation?cited by 318
  4. 2018Adversarial Attack on Graph Structured Datacited by 300
  5. 2019Adversarial Attacks on Graph Neural Networks via Meta Learningcited by 261
  6. 2019Topology Attack and Defense for Graph Neural Networks: An Optimization Perspectivecited by 196
  7. 2023Graph Inductive Biases in Transformers without Message Passingcited by 150
  8. 2018Adversarial Attacks on Node Embeddings via Graph Poisoningcited by 109
  9. 2021Robustness of Graph Neural Networks at Scalecited by 100
  10. 2023Attending to Graph Transformerscited by 81
  11. 2021User Preference-aware Fake News Detectioncited by 76
  12. 2021TDGIA:Effective Injection Attacks on Graph Neural Networkscited by 67
  13. 2024Polynormer: Polynomial-Expressive Graph Transformer in Linear Timecited by 64
  14. 2022Understanding and Improving Graph Injection Attack by Promoting Unnoticeabilitycited by 62
  15. 2020Scalable Attack on Graph Data by Injecting Vicious Nodescited by 50
  16. 2023Are Defenses for Graph Neural Networks Robust?cited by 38
  17. 2023Attacking Fake News Detectors via Manipulating News Social Engagementcited by 23
  18. 2023Revisiting Robustness in Graph Machine Learningcited by 19
  19. 2021Graph Structural Attack by Perturbing Spectral Distancecited by 16
  20. 2023On the Adversarial Robustness of Graph Contrastive Learning Methodscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.