mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Estimating Agreement by Chance for Sequence Annotation

arXiv 2407.11371 ↗First posted 16 Jul 2024cs.CLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In the field of natural language processing, correction of performance assessment for chance agreement plays a crucial role in evaluating the reliability of annotations. However, there is a notable dearth of research focusing on chance correction for assessing the reliability of sequence annotation tasks, despite their widespread prevalence in the field. To address this gap, this paper introduces a novel model for generating random annotations, which serves as the foundation for estimating chance agreement in sequence annotation tasks. Utilizing the proposed randomization model and a related comparison approach, we successfully derive the analytical form of the distribution, enabling the computation of the probable location of each annotated text segment and subsequent chance agreement estimation. Through a combination simulation and corpus-based evaluation, we successfully assess its applicability and validate its accuracy and efficacy.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Jul 2024.

Builds on

5 of 26 references.

References · 5

  1. 2021ExplainaBoard: An Explainable Leaderboard for NLPcited by 50
  2. 2017The Impact of Random Models on Clustering Similaritycited by 34
  3. 2013An Empirical Study into Annotator Agreement, Ground Truth Estimation, and Algorithm Evaluationcited by 16
  4. 2015What the F-measure doesn't measure: Features, Flaws, Fallacies and Fixescited by 10
  5. 2019Understanding partition comparison indices based on counting object pairscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.