Estimating Agreement by Chance for Sequence Annotation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In the field of natural language processing, correction of performance assessment for chance agreement plays a crucial role in evaluating the reliability of annotations. However, there is a notable dearth of research focusing on chance correction for assessing the reliability of sequence annotation tasks, despite their widespread prevalence in the field. To address this gap, this paper introduces a novel model for generating random annotations, which serves as the foundation for estimating chance agreement in sequence annotation tasks. Utilizing the proposed randomization model and a related comparison approach, we successfully derive the analytical form of the distribution, enabling the computation of the probable location of each annotated text segment and subsequent chance agreement estimation. Through a combination simulation and corpus-based evaluation, we successfully assess its applicability and validate its accuracy and efficacy.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Jul 2024.
Builds on
5 of 26 references.
References · 5
- 2021ExplainaBoard: An Explainable Leaderboard for NLPcited by 50
- 2017The Impact of Random Models on Clustering Similaritycited by 34
- 2013An Empirical Study into Annotator Agreement, Ground Truth Estimation, and Algorithm Evaluationcited by 16
- 2015What the F-measure doesn't measure: Features, Flaws, Fallacies and Fixescited by 10
- 2019Understanding partition comparison indices based on counting object pairscited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.