mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Effective Design Verification -- Constrained Random with Python and Cocotb

arXiv 2407.10312 ↗First posted 6 May 2024cs.AR cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Being the most widely used language across the world due to its simplicity and with 35 keywords (v3.7), Python attracts both hardware and software engineers. Python-based verification environment leverages open-source libraries such as cocotb and cocotb-coverage that enables interfacing the tesbenches with any available simulator and facilitating constrained randomization, coverage respectively. These libraries significantly ease the development of testbenches and have the potential to reduce the setup cost. The goal of this paper is to assess the effectiveness of a Python-Cocotb verification setup with design IPs and compare its features and performance metrics with the current de-facto hardware verification language i.e., SystemVerilog.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 May 2024.

Builds on

2 of 17 references.

References · 2

  1. 2019Optimizing Design Verification using Machine Learning: Doing better than Randomcited by 8
  2. 2020Optimising Design Verification Using Machine Learning: An Open Source Solutioncited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.