Structuring Authenticity Assessments on Historical Documents using LLMs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Given the wide use of forgery throughout history, scholars have and are continuously engaged in assessing the authenticity of historical documents. However, online catalogues merely offer descriptive metadata for these documents, relegating discussions about their authenticity to free-text formats, making it difficult to study these assessments at scale. This study explores the generation of structured data about documents' authenticity assessment from natural language texts. Our pipeline exploits Large Language Models (LLMs) to select, extract and classify relevant claims about the topic without the need for training, and Semantic Web technologies to structure and type-validate the LLM's results. The final output is a catalogue of documents whose authenticity has been debated, along with scholars' opinions on their authenticity. This process can serve as a valuable resource for integration into catalogues, allowing room for more intricate queries and analyses on the evolution of these debates over centuries.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 12 Jul 2024.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.
- 2025Automated Archival Descriptions with Federated Intelligence of LLMscited by 1
- 2026Chronos: The AI Co-Historiancited by 0
- 2026Chronos: The AI Co-Historian4 Apr 2026
- 2025Automated Archival Descriptions with Federated Intelligence of LLMs8 Apr 2025