mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Generalization Error Matters in Decentralized Learning Under Byzantine Attacks

arXiv 2407.08632 ↗First posted 11 Jul 2024cs.LGcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recently, decentralized learning has emerged as a popular peer-to-peer signal and information processing paradigm that enables model training across geographically distributed agents in a scalable manner, without the presence of any central server. When some of the agents are malicious (also termed as Byzantine), resilient decentralized learning algorithms are able to limit the impact of these Byzantine agents without knowing their number and identities, and have guaranteed optimization errors. However, analysis of the generalization errors, which are critical to implementations of the trained models, is still lacking. In this paper, we provide the first analysis of the generalization errors for a class of popular Byzantine-resilient decentralized stochastic gradient descent (DSGD) algorithms. Our theoretical results reveal that the generalization errors cannot be entirely eliminated because of the presence of the Byzantine agents, even if the number of training samples are infinitely large. Numerical experiments are conducted to confirm our theoretical results.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Jul 2024.

Builds on

25 of 42 references.

References · 25

  1. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
  2. 2018Byzantine-Robust Distributed Learning: Towards Optimal Statistical Ratescited by 711
  3. 2015Train faster, generalize better: Stability of stochastic gradient descentcited by 552
  4. 2017Can Decentralized Algorithms Outperform Centralized Algorithms? A Case Study for Decentralized Parallel Stochastic Gradient Descentcited by 502
  5. 2017Information-theoretic analysis of generalization capability of learning algorithmscited by 303
  6. 2019A Little Is Enough: Circumventing Defenses For Distributed Learningcited by 288
  7. 2018RSA: Byzantine-Robust Stochastic Aggregation Methods for Distributed Learning from Heterogeneous Datasetscited by 149
  8. 2020Learning from History for Byzantine Robust Optimizationcited by 137
  9. 2021Decentralized Federated Learning: Balancing Communication and Computing Costscited by 55
  10. 2018Stability and Convergence Trade-off of Iterative Optimization Algorithmscited by 53
  11. 2019BRIDGE: Byzantine-resilient Decentralized Gradient Descentcited by 45
  12. 2021A Unified and Refined Convergence Analysis for Non-Convex Decentralized Learningcited by 44
13 more
  1. 2022Topology-aware Generalization of Decentralized SGDcited by 38
  2. 2021Stability of SGD: Tightness Analysis and Improved Boundscited by 33
  3. 2017A PAC-Bayesian Analysis of Randomized Learning with Application to Stochastic Gradient Descentcited by 29
  4. 2021Time-independent Generalization Bounds for SGLD in Non-convex Settingscited by 27
  5. 2022Byzantine-Resilient Decentralized Stochastic Optimization with Robust Aggregation Rulescited by 23
  6. 2023Accelerating Hybrid Federated Learning Convergence under Partial Participationcited by 15
  7. 2018Graph-Dependent Implicit Regularisation for Distributed Stochastic Subgradient Descentcited by 14
  8. 2022On Generalization of Decentralized Learning with Separable Datacited by 8
  9. 2023Byzantine-Robust Distributed Online Learning: Taming Adversarial Participants in An Adversarial Environmentcited by 8
  10. 2023On the Tradeoff between Privacy Preservation and Byzantine-Robustness in Decentralized Learningcited by 8
  11. 2023Uniform-in-Time Wasserstein Stability Bounds for (Noisy) Stochastic Gradient Descentcited by 6
  12. 2023Generalization Guarantees via Algorithm-dependent Rademacher Complexitycited by 4
  13. 2024Convex SGD: Generalization Without Early Stoppingcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 4.

4 papers.