mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Model-agnostic clean-label backdoor mitigation in cybersecurity environments

arXiv 2407.08159 ↗First posted 11 Jul 2024cs.CR cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The training phase of machine learning models is a delicate step, especially in cybersecurity contexts. Recent research has surfaced a series of insidious training-time attacks that inject backdoors in models designed for security classification tasks without altering the training labels. With this work, we propose new techniques that leverage insights in cybersecurity threat models to effectively mitigate these clean-label poisoning attacks, while preserving the model utility. By performing density-based clustering on a carefully chosen feature subspace, and progressively isolating the suspicious clusters through a novel iterative scoring procedure, our defensive mechanism can mitigate the attacks without requiring many of the common assumptions in the existing backdoor defense literature. To show the generality of our proposed mitigation, we evaluate it on two clean-label model-agnostic attacks on two different classic cybersecurity data modalities: network flows classification and malware classification, using gradient boosting and neural network models.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Jul 2024.

Builds on

27 of 62 references.

References · 27

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  2. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  3. 2018Fine-Pruning: Defending Against Backdooring Attacks on Deep Neural Networkscited by 550
  4. 2018Poison Frogs! Targeted Clean-Label Poisoning Attacks on Neural Networkscited by 500
  5. 2018Spectral Signatures in Backdoor Attackscited by 457
  6. 2018Detecting Backdoor Attacks on Deep Neural Networks by Activation Clusteringcited by 429
  7. 2021Neural Attention Distillation: Erasing Backdoor Triggers from Deep Neural Networkscited by 313
  8. 2017Certified Defenses for Data Poisoning Attackscited by 288
  9. 2019Label-Consistent Backdoor Attackscited by 285
  10. 2023Poisoning Web-Scale Training Datasets is Practicalcited by 276
  11. 2021Anti-Backdoor Learning: Training Clean Models on Poisoned Datacited by 258
  12. 2019Detecting AI Trojans Using Meta Neural Analysiscited by 192
15 more
  1. 2018EMBER: An Open Dataset for Training Static PE Malware Machine Learning Modelscited by 164
  2. 2022Backdoor Defense via Decoupling the Training Processcited by 149
  3. 2021SPECTRE: Defending Against Backdoor Attacks Using Robust Statisticscited by 123
  4. 2020Adversarial Machine Learning -- Industry Perspectivescited by 121
  5. 2020Deep Partition Aggregation: Provable Defense against General Poisoning Attackscited by 112
  6. 2020On Certifying Robustness against Backdoor Attacks via Randomized Smoothingcited by 74
  7. 2022Improved Certified Defenses against Data Poisoning with (Deterministic) Finite Aggregationcited by 50
  8. 2022Towards A Proactive ML Approach for Detecting Backdoor Poison Samplescited by 40
  9. 2023Robust Backdoor Detection for Deep Learning via Topological Evolution Dynamicscited by 24
  10. 2019FENCE: Feasible Evasion Attacks on Neural Networks in Constrained Environmentscited by 23
  11. 2022Jigsaw Puzzle: Selective Backdoor Attack to Subvert Malware Classifierscited by 14
  12. 2022Selective Amnesia: On Efficient, High-Fidelity and Blind Suppression of Backdoor Effects in Trojaned Machine Learning Modelscited by 11
  13. 2021Launching Adversarial Attacks against Network Intrusion Detection Systems for IoTcited by 9
  14. 2021PORTFILER: Port-Level Network Profiling for Self-Propagating Malware Detectioncited by 3
  15. 2023Poisoning Network Flow Classifierscited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.