The Misclassification Likelihood Matrix: Some Classes Are More Likely To Be Misclassified Than Others
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This study introduces the Misclassification Likelihood Matrix (MLM) as a novel tool for quantifying the reliability of neural network predictions under distribution shifts. The MLM is obtained by leveraging softmax outputs and clustering techniques to measure the distances between the predictions of a trained neural network and class centroids. By analyzing these distances, the MLM provides a comprehensive view of the model's misclassification tendencies, enabling decision-makers to identify the most common and critical sources of errors. The MLM allows for the prioritization of model improvements and the establishment of decision thresholds based on acceptable risk levels. The approach is evaluated on the MNIST dataset using a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) and a perturbed version of the dataset to simulate distribution shifts. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of the MLM in assessing the reliability of predictions and highlight its potential in enhancing the interpretability and risk mitigation capabilities of neural networks. The implications of this work extend beyond image classification, with ongoing applications in autonomous systems, such as self-driving cars, to improve the safety and reliability of decision-making in complex, real-world environments.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Jul 2024.
Builds on
24 of 42 references.
References · 24
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,448
- 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,926
- 2015Domain-Adversarial Training of Neural Networkscited by 3,044
- 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,877
- 2016A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networkscited by 2,385
- 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,352
- 2015Deep Compression: Compressing Deep Neural Networks with Pruning, Trained Quantization and Huffman Codingcited by 2,329
- 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,850
12 more
- 2016Concrete Problems in AI Safetycited by 1,642
- 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,416
- 2019Energy and Policy Considerations for Deep Learning in NLPcited by 1,254
- 2021A Survey of Quantization Methods for Efficient Neural Network Inferencecited by 815
- 2018Deep Visual Domain Adaptation: A Surveycited by 635
- 2019Green AIcited by 627
- 2019Quantifying the Carbon Emissions of Machine Learningcited by 521
- 2017Countering Adversarial Images using Input Transformationscited by 520
- 2020Learning under Concept Drift: A Reviewcited by 477
- 2020The Computational Limits of Deep Learningcited by 193
- 2018Evaluating Uncertainty Quantification in End-to-End Autonomous Driving Controlcited by 55
- 2022A Stitch in Time Saves Nine: A Train-Time Regularizing Loss for Improved Neural Network Calibrationcited by 49
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
3 papers.