Parameter Efficient Fine Tuning for Multi-scanner PET to PET Reconstruction
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Reducing scan time in Positron Emission Tomography (PET) imaging while maintaining high-quality images is crucial for minimizing patient discomfort and radiation exposure. Due to the limited size of datasets and distribution discrepancy across scanners in medical imaging, fine-tuning in a parameter-efficient and effective manner is on the rise. Motivated by the potential of Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT), we aim to address these issues by effectively leveraging PEFT to improve limited data and GPU resource issues in multi-scanner setups. In this paper, we introduce PETITE, Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning for MultI-scanner PET to PET REconstruction that uses fewer than 1% of the parameters. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to systematically explore the efficacy of diverse PEFT techniques in medical imaging reconstruction tasks via prevalent encoder-decoder-type deep models. This investigation, in particular, brings intriguing insights into PETITE as we show further improvements by treating encoder and decoder separately and mixing different PEFT methods, namely, Mix-PEFT. Using multi-scanner PET datasets comprised of five different scanners, we extensively test the cross-scanner PET scan time reduction performances (i.e., a model pre-trained on one scanner is fine-tuned on a different scanner) of 21 feasible Mix-PEFT combinations to derive optimal PETITE. We show that training with less than 1% parameters using PETITE performs on par with full fine-tuning (i.e., 100% parameter)
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Jul 2024.
Builds on
17 of 24 references.
References · 17
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
- 2019Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLPcited by 4,195
- 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,878
- 2014Conditional Generative Adversarial Netscited by 2,152
- 2022Visual Prompt Tuningcited by 1,674
- 2021UNETR: Transformers for 3D Medical Image Segmentationcited by 954
- 2021CvT: Introducing Convolutions to Vision Transformerscited by 946
- 2021Towards a Unified View of Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learningcited by 863
- 2020AdapterFusion: Non-Destructive Task Composition for Transfer Learningcited by 780
- 2021P-Tuning v2: Prompt Tuning Can Be Comparable to Fine-tuning Universally Across Scales and Taskscited by 686
- 2022Scaling & Shifting Your Features: A New Baseline for Efficient Model Tuningcited by 292
5 more
- 2022KronA: Parameter Efficient Tuning with Kronecker Adaptercited by 130
- 2017Medical Image Analysis using Convolutional Neural Networks: A Reviewcited by 99
- 2023Improving Visual Prompt Tuning for Self-supervised Vision Transformerscited by 57
- 2023Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning for Medical Image Analysis: The Missed Opportunitycited by 54
- 2023Artificial General Intelligence for Medical Imaging Analysiscited by 32
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.
1 paper.