Explainable Differential Privacy-Hyperdimensional Computing for Balancing Privacy and Transparency in Additive Manufacturing Monitoring
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Machine Learning (ML) models integrated with in-situ sensing offer transformative solutions for defect detection in Additive Manufacturing (AM), but this integration brings critical challenges in safeguarding sensitive data, such as part designs and material compositions. Differential Privacy (DP), which introduces mathematically controlled noise, provides a balance between data utility and privacy. However, black-box Artificial Intelligence (AI) models often obscure how this noise impacts model accuracy, complicating the optimization of privacy-accuracy trade-offs. This study introduces the Differential Privacy-Hyperdimensional Computing (DP-HD) framework, a novel approach combining Explainable AI (XAI) and vector symbolic paradigms to quantify and predict noise effects on accuracy using a Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) metric. DP-HD enables precise tuning of DP noise levels, ensuring an optimal balance between privacy and performance. The framework has been validated using real-world AM data, demonstrating its applicability to industrial environments. Experimental results demonstrate DP-HD's capability to achieve state-of-the-art accuracy (94.43%) with robust privacy protections in anomaly detection for AM, even under significant noise conditions. Beyond AM, DP-HD holds substantial promise for broader applications in privacy-sensitive domains such as healthcare, financial services, and government data management, where securing sensitive data while maintaining high ML performance is paramount.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 87 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Jul 2024.
Builds on
20 of 87 references.
References · 20
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
- 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,415
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
- 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,231
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
- 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
- 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,348
- 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,278
- 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,309
- 2014Striving for Simplicity: The All Convolutional Netcited by 983
8 more
- 2018This Looks Like That: Deep Learning for Interpretable Image Recognitioncited by 731
- 2017Renyi Differential Privacycited by 643
- 2021Opacus: User-Friendly Differential Privacy Library in PyTorchcited by 375
- 2016Not Just a Black Box: Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 295
- 2017Deep Learning for Case-Based Reasoning through Prototypes: A Neural Network that Explains Its Predictionscited by 234
- 2020On Interpretability of Artificial Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 88
- 2015On the Error of Random Fourier Featurescited by 76
- 2016Process Monitoring of Extrusion Based 3D Printing via Laser Scanningcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.
1 paper.