Non-Robust Features are Not Always Useful in One-Class Classification
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The robustness of machine learning models has been questioned by the existence of adversarial examples. We examine the threat of adversarial examples in practical applications that require lightweight models for one-class classification. Building on Ilyas et al. (2019), we investigate the vulnerability of lightweight one-class classifiers to adversarial attacks and possible reasons for it. Our results show that lightweight one-class classifiers learn features that are not robust (e.g. texture) under stronger attacks. However, unlike in multi-class classification (Ilyas et al., 2019), these non-robust features are not always useful for the one-class task, suggesting that learning these unpredictive and non-robust features is an unwanted consequence of training.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 14 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jul 2024.
Builds on
11 of 14 references.
References · 11
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
- 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,415
- 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
- 2019Searching for MobileNetV3cited by 1,984
- 2019Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Featurescited by 950
- 2017Evasion Attacks against Machine Learning at Test Timecited by 686
- 2017Adversarial Examples Are Not Easily Detected: Bypassing Ten Detection Methodscited by 542
- 2020A Unifying Review of Deep and Shallow Anomaly Detectioncited by 423
- 2023Adversarial Examples Are Not Real Featurescited by 16
- 2021Compact and Optimal Deep Learning with Recurrent Parameter Generatorscited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.