A Fair Post-Processing Method based on the MADD Metric for Predictive Student Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Predictive student models are increasingly used in learning environments. However, due to the rising social impact of their usage, it is now all the more important for these models to be both sufficiently accurate and fair in their predictions. To evaluate algorithmic fairness, a new metric has been developed in education, namely the Model Absolute Density Distance (MADD). This metric enables us to measure how different a predictive model behaves regarding two groups of students, in order to quantify its algorithmic unfairness. In this paper, we thus develop a post-processing method based on this metric, that aims at improving the fairness while preserving the accuracy of relevant predictive models' results. We experiment with our approach on the task of predicting student success in an online course, using both simulated and real-world educational data, and obtain successful results. Our source code and data are in open access at https://github.com/melinaverger/MADD .
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 10 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jul 2024.
Builds on
6 of 10 references.
References · 6
- 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,917
- 2021A Clarification of the Nuances in the Fairness Metrics Landscapecited by 98
- 2020Algorithmic Fairness in Educationcited by 44
- 2024Educational data mining and learning analytics: An updated surveycited by 17
- 2021Equity and Artificial Intelligence in Education: Will "AIEd" Amplify or Alleviate Inequities in Education?cited by 9
- 2023Is Your Model "MADD"? A Novel Metric to Evaluate Algorithmic Fairness for Predictive Student Modelscited by 7
Built on by
Not cited yet.