mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Privacy of the last iterate in cyclically-sampled DP-SGD on nonconvex composite losses

arXiv 2407.05237 ↗First posted 7 Jul 2024cs.LG cs.CR cs.DScited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Differentially-private stochastic gradient descent (DP-SGD) is a family of iterative machine learning training algorithms that privatize gradients to generate a sequence of differentially-private (DP) model parameters. It is also the standard tool used to train DP models in practice, even though most users are only interested in protecting the privacy of the final model. Tight DP accounting for the last iterate would minimize the amount of noise required while maintaining the same privacy guarantee and potentially increasing model utility. However, last-iterate accounting is challenging, and existing works require strong assumptions not satisfied by most implementations. These include assuming (i) the global sensitivity constant is known - to avoid gradient clipping; (ii) the loss function is Lipschitz or convex; and (iii) input batches are sampled randomly. In this work, we forego any unrealistic assumptions and provide privacy bounds for the most commonly used variant of DP-SGD, in which data is traversed cyclically, gradients are clipped, and only the last model is released. More specifically, we establish new Renyi differential privacy (RDP) upper bounds for the last iterate under realistic assumptions of small stepsize and Lipschitz smoothness of the loss function. Our general bounds also recover the special-case convex bounds when the weak-convexity parameter of the objective function approaches zero and no clipping is performed. The approach itself leverages optimal transport techniques for last iterate bounds, which is a nontrivial task when the data is traversed cyclically and the loss function is nonconvex.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jul 2024.

Builds on

18 of 29 references.

References · 18

  1. 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
  2. 2021Opacus: User-Friendly Differential Privacy Library in PyTorchcited by 375
  3. 2013The Composition Theorem for Differential Privacycited by 290
  4. 2018Improving the Gaussian Mechanism for Differential Privacy: Analytical Calibration and Optimal Denoisingcited by 216
  5. 2019R'enyi Differential Privacy of the Sampled Gaussian Mechanismcited by 199
  6. 2021Practical and Private (Deep) Learning without Sampling or Shufflingcited by 169
  7. 2020Private Stochastic Convex Optimization: Optimal Rates in Linear Timecited by 152
  8. 2018Privacy Amplification by Iterationcited by 97
  9. 2021Differential Privacy Dynamics of Langevin Diffusion and Noisy Gradient Descentcited by 71
  10. 2022Privacy of Noisy Stochastic Gradient Descent: More Iterations without More Privacy Losscited by 60
  11. 2022Differentially Private Learning Needs Hidden State (Or Much Faster Convergence)cited by 45
  12. 2024How Private are DP-SGD Implementations?cited by 22
6 more
  1. 2023Privacy Loss of Noisy Stochastic Gradient Descent Might Converge Even for Non-Convex Lossescited by 10
  2. 2024Shifted Interpolation for Differential Privacycited by 10
  3. 2024Last Iterate Convergence of Incremental Methods and Applications in Continual Learningcited by 10
  4. 2024On the Last-Iterate Convergence of Shuffling Gradient Methodscited by 9
  5. 2021A unified analysis of a class of proximal bundle methods for solving hybrid convex composite optimization problemscited by 7
  6. 2021Accelerated Inexact First-Order Methods for Solving Nonconvex Composite Optimization Problemscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 4.

5 papers.